Back

Top-Down Proteomics in the Assessment of Kidney Donor Quality: a novel approach to increased organ utilization

Ctortecka, C.; Jaishankar, D.; Su, P.; Huang, C.-F.; Pla, I.; Henning, N.; Hollas, M. A. R.; Callegari, M. A.; Taylor, M. E.; Lee, Y. M.; Daud, A.; Pinelli, D. F.; Rohan, V.; Caldwell, M. A.; Forte, E.; Sanchez, A.; Kelleher, N. L.; Nadig, S. N.

2026-02-04 transplantation
10.64898/2026.02.02.26345404 medRxiv
Show abstract

Kidney transplantation faces a critical paradox: while thousands await organs, approximately 30% of potential deceased donor kidneys are discarded for various reasons, including subjective assessments due to the lack of an objective molecular biomarker of preservation quality. Here, we applied novel "top-down" proteoform imaging mass spectrometry across living donor (LD), deceased donor (brain death or cardiac death), and discarded human kidneys to quantify proteoforms correlating with post-transplant kidney function. This approach preserves post-translational modifications and splice variants, revealing molecular tissue variability beyond protein presence. LD kidneys displayed robust metabolic signatures, including L-xylulose reductase and cytochrome oxidase subunits, whereas deceased donor and discarded organs showed elevated cellular stress markers such as alpha-B-crystallin and peroxiredoxin 1. Post-transplant blood proteoform analysis validated tissue findings, demonstrating persistent cellular stress and immune activation in deceased donor recipients compared with physiologic wound healing in LD recipients. Consistent with these molecular predictions, serum creatinine levels were highest in DCD, intermediate in DBD, and lowest in LD recipients. The intersection of tissue proteoform signatures across all marginal tissues identified four proteoforms consistently elevated in deceased and discarded kidneys: ACTG1, acetylated CRYAB, PARK7, and S100A4. Collectively, these proteoforms capture key molecular indicators of graft quality, reflecting oxidative stress, cellular injury, and immune activation pathways. As such, they represent promising point-of-care (POC) biomarker candidates for objective kidney classification, potentially improving donor kidney utilization. Translational statementCurrent methods for evaluating donor kidney quality rely on subjective assessments, contributing to the discard of approximately 30% of potentially viable organs. This study demonstrates that "top-down" proteomics can objectively identify molecular signatures distinguishing high-quality from marginal donor kidneys. Top-down proteomics analyzes intact proteins with their post-translational modifications or cleavage products, termed proteoforms to provide mechanistic insights into graft quality. We identified four proteoforms (ACTG1, acetylated CRYAB, PARK7, and S100A4) to be consistently elevated in deceased and discarded kidneys, reflecting oxidative stress, cellular injury, and immune activation. These molecular markers correlated with post-transplant kidney outcome, as measured by serum creatinine levels and recipient blood proteoforms. As a next step, validation in larger cohorts could establish these proteoforms as point-of-care biomarkers for real-time donor kidney assessment during procurement. This objective molecular stratification could reduce unnecessary organ discards and improve transplant outcomes by matching organ quality with recipient risk profiles.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
4
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
9
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
10
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
15
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
17
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
19
Kidney International Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
23
npj Regenerative Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
26
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Endocrinology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%