Back

Neonatal anti-seizure Medication Exposure and Long-term Neurological Outcomes

Leskinen, M.; Kaipainen, V.; Ogretir, M.; Metsaranta, M.; Hero, M.; Rautava, S.; Koskinen, M.

2026-02-03 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.02.02.26345337 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAnti-seizure medications (ASMs) are widely used in neonatal intensive care, but there is limited evidence for their safety and long-term outcomes. Phenobarbital is the only ASM generally recommended for use in neonates, but it has been linked with adverse effects in infants. Other anti-seizure medications, such as fosphenytoin, levetiracetam, and midazolam are used off-label in this population. MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational study of 18,548 infants in intensive care at an academic medical center, examining links between neonatal ASM exposure and neurological outcomes over the follow-up period of median 4{middle dot}5 years (IQR 1{middle dot}6 - 9{middle dot}2 years). The real-world clinical data included comprehensive maternal, perinatal, and medication data. The outcomes of interest were cerebral palsy, epilepsy, intellectual disability, and visual impairment. Multivariable cause-specific Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for phenobarbital, levetiracetam, midazolam, and fosphenytoin exposure. Models were adjusted for major perinatal confounders, including gestational age, birth weight, mode of delivery, intraventricular hemorrhage, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, and stroke. FindingsExposure to the median cumulative dose of phenobarbital was associated with increased HR for epilepsy (HR 1{middle dot}35; 95% CI, 1{middle dot}11-1{middle dot}62, p = 0{middle dot}002) visual impairment (HR 1{middle dot}20; 95% CI, 0{middle dot}99-1{middle dot}45, p = 0{middle dot}06), and intellectual disability (HR 1{middle dot}18; 95% CI, 0{middle dot}99-1{middle dot}41, p = 0{middle dot}06). In contrast, levetiracetam was associated with smaller risk increases for cerebral palsy (HR 1{middle dot}13; 95% CI, 1{middle dot}03-1{middle dot}23, p = 0{middle dot}006, epilepsy (HR 1{middle dot}14; 95% CI 1{middle dot}05-1{middle dot}24, p = 0{middle dot}002 and visual impairment (HR 1{middle dot}18; 95% CI 1{middle dot}11-1{middle dot}26, p <0{middle dot}0001). Midazolam exposure was associated with slightly increased risk of intellectual disability (HR 1{middle dot}09, 95% CI, 1{middle dot}02- 1{middle dot}16). Results for fosphenytoin were statistically not significant. We did not find evidence of a dose-dependent effect of phenobarbital, but increased maximum phenobarbital blood concentration were associated with elevated hazard ratios for cerebral palsy (HR 1{middle dot}48; 95% CI, 1{middle dot}07-2{middle dot}06, p = 0{middle dot}02 for 50 {micro}mol/l increase) and epilepsy (HR 1{middle dot}64; 95% CI, 1{middle dot}14-2{middle dot}35, p = 0{middle dot}007 for 50 {micro}mol/l increase). InterpretationThe results align with previous findings linking phenobarbital to neurodevelopmental harm and emphasize the need for its cautious use in neonates. Levetiracetam had more favorable safety profile. These findings highlight the potential of real-world data to inform evidence-based neonatal pharmacotherapy when randomized trials are impractical. FundingThe Foundation for Pediatric Research (Finland), the Association of Friends of the University Childrens Hospitals (Lastenklinikoiden Kummit ry), and internal institutional funding.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
5
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
7
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
10
Epilepsia Open
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Epilepsy & Behavior
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
25
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%