Back

Beyond Lipschitz: Ranking Binding Affinity in Hyperbolic Space

Wu, K.; Hong, X.; Zhu, W.; Gao, B.; Ma, W.-Y.; Lan, Y.

2026-02-03 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.01.703164 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the importance of protein-ligand affinity ranking in drug discovery, existing deep learning models struggle to distinguish hard inactives that are structurally similar to active compounds but biologically inactive. We theoretically show this failure stems from the Lipschitz continuity constraint in Euclidean space, which makes neural networks locally insensitive to subtle yet critical structural perturbations. To overcome this, we propose AlphaRank, which demonstrates that scoring affinity as the negative hyperbolic geodesic distance allows subtle tangential variations to bypass Lipschitz constraints, intuitively corresponding to pivotal binding mode factors such as conformational fit. Meanwhile, AlphaRank employs joint optimization to simultaneously ranking affinity scores among actives in a proximity-aware manner and separate actives from decoy inactives through a geometric cone constraint. Experiments demonstrate that AlphaRank outperforms state-of-the-art models like Boltz-2 in both affinity ranking and active-inactive discrimination, while providing a interpretable representation space.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
14.5%
2
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
5
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
6
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
12
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
13
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
18
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
21
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.7%
28
Artificial Intelligence in the Life Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
29
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
30
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%