An agentic framework turns patient-sourced records into a multimodal map of ALS heterogeneity
Li, Z.; Gao, C.; Kong, J.; Fu, Y.; Wen, S.; Li, G.; Cao, Y.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Jia, S.; Liu, X.; Cai, L.; Yan, F.; Liu, X.; Tian, L.
Show abstract
ALS shows marked clinical heterogeneity, yet much real-world evidence remains trapped in unstructured reports. Here we introduce MEDSTREM, a large-language-model (LLM)-based agent that converts patient-sourced document images into standardized longitudinal electronic health records, enabling bottom-up cohort building and linkage to trials and multi-omics. By applying MEDSTREM to clinical report images from 8,298 individuals collected via AskHelpU and harmonizing with PRO-ACT and Answer ALS, we generated 17,602 standardized records and multi-omics profiles from 940 induced motor neuron lines. Progression modelling resolved five subtypes and a continuous degeneration score with interpretable anchors: hand-grip strength and forced vital capacity tracked functional loss, and malnutrition emerged as a modifiable correlate. Across RNA-seq and ATAC-seq, clinical severity is aligned with suppression of cell-cycle programmes, declining histone-gene activity and genome-wide chromatin opening, suggesting distinct epigenetic trajectories. These findings establish an agentic AI framework that turns unstructured clinical records into mechanistic insight and links them to multi-omics, reframing ALS studies from top-down, trial-centric analyses to a bottom-up, patient-sourced approach that reveals actionable heterogeneity.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining and predicting transdiagnostic categories of neurodegenerative disease 94%
- Self-Organization of Sinusoidal Vessels in Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Human Liver Bud Organoids 94%
- Neuroimaging-AI Endophenotypes of Brain Diseases in the General Population: Towards a Dimensional System of Vulnerability 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.