Back

Distinct neural modes carry information about grasp force and phase in the sensorimotor cortex

Blumenthal, G. H.; Dekleva, B. M.; Gontier, C.; Gonzalez, I. C.; Gonzalez-Martinez, J. A.; Yu, B. M.; Batista, A. P.; Sobinov, A. R.; Miller, L. E.; Gaunt, R. A.; Boninger, M. L.; Chase, S. M.; Collinger, J. L.

2026-02-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.01.702680 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humans perform a variety of complex hand movements to manipulate objects, requiring precise control of changing forces. Understanding the role of sensorimotor cortex and the cortical dynamics underlying these actions is crucial for developing interventions that restore dexterous hand function after injury or disease. In this study, two individuals with tetraplegia resulting from cervical spinal cord injury attempted a series of isometric grasps. Neural activity was recorded from the motor and somatosensory cortices using intracortical microelectrode arrays while participants attempted to exert a static force or to ramp force up and down. Despite their inability to execute movement, and with limited afferent input, the spiking activity in motor and somatosensory cortex was modulated with the task. Within the neural response we identified independent neural modes - distinct patterns of population-level neural activity - that were informative about both the timing and magnitude of the force. Moreover, distinct neural modes were observed during static and dynamic grasping conditions, suggesting independent control schemes for maintaining and changing forces. These modes were related to phases of the task, including the onset, offset, holding periods, as well as phases of increasing and decreasing force. These results will inform the design of intracortical brain-computer interface (iBCI) systems that can leverage these naturally occurring patterns of grasp and force control to restore dexterous hand function. Significance StatementRestoring dexterous hand function after injury remains a major challenge, partly due to an incomplete understanding of the cortical dynamics underlying grasping and force control. In this study, we investigated neural activity within the motor and somatosensory cortices of individuals with tetraplegia attempting to perform grasps to different target forces with varying temporal profiles. We identified distinct neural modes modulated during specific phases of grasp that encode force information throughout the task. These findings suggest that brain-computer interfaces could leverage these native neural modes to restore grasping and force modulation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
22.0%
2
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
3
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.6%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
7
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.2%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.0%
11
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
14
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
19
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.6%
23
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.6%