Back

Functional genomics identifies therapeutic options, biomarkers, and resistance mechanisms for high-grade gliomas

Lin, W.-H.; Kosari, F.; Smadbeck, J. B.; Barrett, M. T.; Feathers, R. W.; Hall, J.; Sadeghian, D.; Sotiriou, S.; Johnson, S. H.; Harris, F. R.; Berry, T.; McCune, A. F.; Murphy, S. J.; Kinsella, L.; Haydu, L. E.; Moniz-Garcia, D.; Fortin Ensign, S. P.; Yang, L.; Emanuel, A. R.; Jones, L. A.; Schaefer-Klein, J. L.; Ida, C. M.; Salomao, M. A.; Sherman, W. J.; Porter, A. B.; Rosenfeld, S. S.; Kizilbash, S. H.; Jaeckle, K. A.; Mrugala, M. M.; Mansfield, A. S.; Borad, M. S.; Bendok, B. R.; Burns, T. C.; Quinones-Hinojosa, A.; Cheville, J. C.; Vasmatzis, G.; Anastasiadis, P. Z.

2026-02-03 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.02.01.701806 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are aggressive tumors with poor outcomes and limited treatment options. Here, we combined genomic and transcriptomic tumor profiling with drug testing in a patient-derived 3-dimensional culture model to identify individualized treatments and predictive biomarkers. Activity of single agents targeting frequently dysregulated glioma pathways was relatively poor ex vivo and generally reflected historical patient data. However, compounds targeting PI3K, epigenetic, and survival/senescence signaling were effective in some cases. Drug sensitivity correlated with transcriptional rather than genomic features and suggested heterogeneity as a resistance mechanism. Bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibition was particularly effective in tumors enriched in the mesenchymal transcriptional subtype, promoted proneural transition, and was overcome by upregulated PI3K signaling. Notably, combinations were largely effective, with 6 strategies exhibiting stronger efficacy than corresponding single agents in most cases (58-77%). This study identifies HGG vulnerabilities and associated biomarkers, resistance mechanisms, and effective combination strategies that warrant further clinical validation. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=171 SRC="FIGDIR/small/701806v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (31K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cdb75corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c133e6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1365153org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11543a4_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
5
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.1%
11
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
13
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
17
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
19
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
21
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
29
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%