Back

A motif-vocabulary model of CAR T-cell intracellular domains identifies determinants of immunophenotype differentiation

Kelly, C.; Bahr, R.; Zhu, W.; Keyvanfar, K.; Dagur, P.; Cordes, S.

2026-02-05 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.02.01.700582 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell efficacy depends critically on the costimulatory domain, which shapes downstream signaling and the immunophenotype of manufactured products. Despite mechanistic evidence that immune receptors function as motif-based signaling scaffolds, CAR engineering has focused on a narrow set of costimulatory domains--principally CD28 and 4-1BB--leaving much of the available signaling design space unexplored. Here, we screened 1,243 naturally occurring intracellular domains as costimulatory modules in an anti-CD20 CAR backbone in primary human CD8+ T cells and quantified construct enrichment across memory-differentiation and PD-1-defined immunophenotypic compartments. Using Eukaryotic Linear Motif (ELM) annotations, we analyzed motif-phenotype associations via complementary statistical approaches: Mann-Whitney screening and negative binomial regression identified ELM features associated with differential construct representation, while Dirichlet-Multinomial modeling--which properly accounts for the compositional structure of FACS-partitioned data--revealed that individual ELMs do not significantly alter phenotype distributions. This discrepancy indicates that single motifs primarily affect proliferation or survival rather than differentiation fate. In contrast, construct-level analysis using a leave-one-out compositional test identified specific costimulatory domains with significant phenotype-shifting effects, demonstrating that particular combinations of ELMs--rather than individual motifs--determine immunophenotype. These results suggest that CAR T-cell differentiation state is governed by the integrated output of multiple signaling motifs and provide a combinatorial framework for rational costimulatory domain engineering.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.