Back

Development and internal validation of risk scores to predict survival in the pediatric population following in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Mawani, M.; Knight, J. H.; Shen, Y.; McNally, B.; Brown, L.; Ebell, M.

2026-02-03 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.02.01.26345326 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionIn-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in the pediatric population is associated with poor survival and neurological outcomes. We aimed to develop and internally validate a risk score to predict survival to discharge following pediatric IHCA. MethodsWe included pediatric IHCA patients in the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation(R) registry between 2005 and 2021. We used logistic regression (LR), classification and regression trees (CART), and artificial neural networks (ANN) to develop models using 70% of the data and validate them using the remaining 30% of the data. Discrimination was based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and predictive accuracy on percent survival in each risk group. ResultsWe included 6141 patients with a mean age of 4.8 years, of whom 41.3% (n = 2535) were infants < 1 year of age and 39.1% of whom survived to hospital discharge. We developed separate models for infants and older children. The most important independent pre-arrest predictors were age, illness category, acyanotic cardiac malformation, cyanotic cardiac malformation, hepatic insufficiency, hypotension/hypoperfusion, metabolic/electrolyte abnormality, metastatic/hematologic malignancy, renal insufficiency, congenital malformation, septicemia, hypotension, trauma, and pediatric cerebral performance score on admission. All three approaches showed good classification accuracy in the derivation sample (AUC for LR: 0.70, 0.71, AUC for CART: 0.68, 0.70, AUC for ANN: 0.76, 0.74 for infants and older children respectively) and used almost the same number of variables. Logistic regression and CART models were the most useful as they identified patients with the lowest survival, showed good discrimination, and could be used to develop a simple point score and decision trees that can be implemented in the clinical or research setting. In infants, the average probability of survival was 10%, 36%, and 60% whereas in older children it was 6.2%, 31.1%, and 62.3% in the low, moderate, and high survival categories in the LR model. ConclusionPediatric patients experiencing IHCA can be classified into low, moderate, and high survival categories using a simple risk score and easily identified pre-arrest variables. These risk scores can support clinical decisions, facilitate research, and help monitor the quality of medical services.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
2
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.8%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
6
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
7
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
9
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
10
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
50% of probability mass above
12
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
13
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
14
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Epilepsy Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
29
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%