Back

Timing and Duration of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use and Risk of Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy

Niazi, S.; Gnesin, F.; Jawad, B. N.; Niazi, Z.; Yazdanfard, P. D. W.; Toft-Petersen, A. P.; Soerensen, K. K.; Meaidi, A.; Subhi, Y.; Torp Pedersen, C.

2026-02-03 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.02.01.26345315 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo investigate the association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use and nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) in type 2 diabetes, examining treatment recency and cumulative duration. MethodsThis nationwide registry-based nested case-control study utilised Danish health registries (1996-2023). Among 201,776 metformin-treated adults initiating second-line antihyperglycaemic therapy, 123 incident NAION cases were matched to 4,920 controls by birth year and sex (incidence-density sampling). Conditional logistic regression estimated adjusted hazard rate ratios (HRs) for GLP-1RA exposure by recency (current 0-90 days; recent 91-365 days) and cumulative duration, adjusting for socioeconomic factors, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, sleep apnoea, and diabetes duration. ResultsGLP-1RA use occurred in 63/123 cases (51.2%) and 1,688/4,920 controls (34.3%). Ever use was associated with a higher NAION rate than other second-line therapies (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.43-3.18). Current use was associated with elevated rates (HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.49-3.48), whereas the estimate for recent use was imprecise (HR 1.69, 95% CI 0.88-3.25). By cumulative duration, no clear evidence of an increase was seen within 0-[1/2] years (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.32-2.05), and rates were highest at [1/2]-1 year (HR 3.63, 95% CI 2.06-6.40) and 1-1[1/2] years (HR 3.52, 95% CI 1.73-7.17). Findings were consistent after HbA1c adjustment and in a new-user analysis. ConclusionGLP-1RA use is associated with a higher NAION rate in type 2 diabetes. This association appears time-dependent, being most pronounced during current treatment and peaking after 6-18 months of cumulative exposure.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.6%
2
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
24.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.3%
6
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
9
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
11
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
14
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
15
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
16
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
21
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%