Back

Symmetric Fusion of fMRI and EEG for Spectrally Resolved Functional Neuroimaging

Kim, J.-H.; Liu, Z.

2026-02-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.31.703060 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and functional MRI (fMRI) offers complementary sensitivity to fast electrophysiological dynamics of EEG and spatially resolved hemodynamics of fMRI, yet previous joint-analysis approaches are confined to fixed task paradigms and struggle with continuous or naturalistic brain states. We FSINC (Fusing Source Imaging based on a Neurovascular Coupling) model, a unified EEG-fMRI source imaging framework that reconstructs cortical activity to simultaneously explain both modalities. FSINC integrates frequency-resolved EEG source activity with fMRI via a data-driven neurovascular coupling model that estimates band-specific coupling coefficients ({beta}) and accommodates a tunable spatial-temporal trade-off through hyperparameters ({lambda}2,{lambda} 3). In realistic simulations, FSINC outperformed conventional methods (wMNE, LORETA) in both spatial and temporal accuracy across EEG SNRs (-10 to 10dB) and numbers of concurrent sources (up to five), with optimal performance at{lambda} 2 = 102 and{lambda} 3=1 (e.g., LE: 0.51{+/-}0.24mm; SDI: 0.03{+/-}0.37mm; temporal accuracy: 0.95 {+/-} 0.05). Applied to simultaneous EEG-fMRI during contrast-reversing visual stimulation (=5.95Hz), FSINC revealed stimulus-locked responses localized to early visual cortex and stimulus-induced modulation of intrinsic alpha oscillations extending into visual and attention networks, patterns that conventional methods failed to capture. Estimated {beta}-weights were broadly consistent with prior reports of negative (theta/alpha) and positive (gamma) BOLD-electrophysiology associations. These findings demonstrate that FSINC enables high-spatiotemporal-resolution source imaging from EEG-fMRI recordings via data-driven hemodynamic modelling, and is expected to be well-suited for continuous and naturalistic brain states (e.g., resting state, natural moving-watching, and narrative listening) that are difficult to interrogate with either modality alone.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.