Back

Do GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Alter Brain Responses to Reward-Related Cues? A Systematic Review

Dang, V.; Sambuco, N.; Yammine, L.; Versace, F.

2026-02-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.31.702984 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are approved for treating type 2 diabetes and obesity and are under investigation as potential treatments for substance use disorders (SUD). GLP-1 RA-induced weight loss is thought to arise from both peripheral effects on gastrointestinal function and central modulation of appetite and reward circuits, though the exact mechanisms are unclear. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies examining brain responses to reward-related cues can help clarify the central mechanisms through which GLP-1 RAs influence reward-seeking behavior. We systematically reviewed the fMRI literature examining how GLP-1 RAs affect brain responses to reward-related cues. We identified 1,209 records through a comprehensive literature search. After screening, only 11 studies met eligibility criteria. The vast majority assessed reactivity to food-related cues, with only one examining drug-related cues (alcohol), leaving neural mechanisms relevant to SUD largely unexplored. None included non-food emotional stimuli as control conditions. Several methodological limitations emerged. Most studies enrolled 20 or fewer participants per group, limiting statistical power. Treatment protocols varied substantially, with some assessing cue responses after single-dose administration and others after chronic treatment. Heterogeneity in medications used further confounds interpretation. The limited evidence tentatively suggests that acute GLP-1 RA administration may reduce brain reactivity to food cues in appetite and reward regions. However, effects appear inconsistent and may attenuate over time. Future studies should recruit larger samples, standardize agents and dosing, and assess responses to diverse motivationally relevant stimuli.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
2
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.3%
3
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
10
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.3%
12
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
23
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
British Journal of Pharmacology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%