Back

Interthalamic adhesion alterations in multiple sclerosis: associations with thalamic damage and cognition

Fournet, A.; Munsch, F.; Koubiyr, I.; Vidal, J.; Morell-Ortega, S.; Saubusse, A.; Charre-Morin, J.; Lataste, K.-K.; Lavielle, A.; Bei, Z.; Coupe, P.; Barbeau, E.; Kumar, V.; Hornberger, M.; Dousset, V.; Brochet, B.; Manjon, J.; Ruet, A.; Tourdias, T.

2026-02-03 neurology
10.64898/2026.01.31.26345261 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background / ObjectivesWe investigated whether the interthalamic adhesion (IA), a midline structure connecting the thalami, is altered in MS and associated with thalamic damages and cognition. MethodsWe prospectively included 32 clinically isolated syndrome/early MS, 31 RRMS, 31 PPMS patients, and 103 matched controls. All underwent anatomical 3T MRI and completed a comprehensive cognitive battery. IA presence, subtype, and volume were assessed by two blinded readers. Thalamic nuclei and other brain structures were segmented automatically. We compared IA subtypes/volumes across groups, analyzed their predictors and explored cognitive associations with multivariate regressions. ResultsIA prevalence did not differ between MS and controls (81.9% vs 74.7%). MS patients showed a shift toward a short IA subtype and reduced IA volume (mean [SD], 146.8 [117.9] vs 230.2 [138.2] mm3; p<0.0001), worsening across phenotypes. Reduced IA volume was independently associated with medial and posterior thalamic nuclei volumes, but not with white matter lesion load or global atrophy. Among cognitive domains, smaller IA volume was independently associated only with executive dysfunction (OR = 0.89 [0.77-0.99], p = 0.021). ConclusionIA volume reduction in MS reflects vulnerability of adjacent thalamic nuclei and is associated with executive dysfunction, supporting IA as a marker of thalamic neurodegeneration. Trial RegistrationMICROSEP: NCT03692975; AUBACOG: NCT03768648; PROCOG: NCT03455582.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.