Back

THR-6E: A Six-Gene Cell-of-Origin Signature Stratifies Risk and Predicts Systemic Therapy Response in ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer

Vasanthakumari, P.; Valencia, I.; Omar, M.; Ince, T. A.

2026-02-03 oncology
10.64898/2026.01.31.26345244 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGenomic assays such as Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, and Prosigna have transformed risk stratification and treatment selection in early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative breast cancers by enabling more precise prognostication and chemotherapy de-escalation in selected patients. However, their clinical utility is limited in lymph nodes positive disease. A major unmet need is the development of compact, mechanistically grounded biomarkers that extend risk and treatment-response prediction to clinically challenging ER+/HER2- subgroups, including lymph node-positive patients. MethodsBuilding on a cell-of-origin framework, we previously established a 70-gene triple hormone receptor (THR; ER, AR, VDR) signature (THR-70) that reflects luminal epithelial differentiation programs and is prognostic across breast cancer subtypes. Here, we refined this framework using interactome-guided clustering to derive a six-gene cell-of-origin signature (THR-6E: KIF4A, KIF2C, CDC20, FAM64A, TPX2, and LMNB2). We evaluated the prognostic and predictive performance of THR-6E across >7,000 breast cancer cases from multiple independent cohorts, assessed treatment-response prediction using endocrine- and chemotherapy-annotated datasets, and performed independent validation in the I-SPY2 adaptive clinical trial. FindingsTHR-6E robustly stratifies relapse-free survival (RFS) in ER+/HER2- breast cancer independent of tumor grade, proliferation status, and subtype. Hazard ratios for RFS were 2.41 (p<1x10-{superscript 1}), 1.61 (p=4.9x10-), and 1.50 (p=6.2x10-3) for grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and 2.16 and 1.33 for Luminal A and Luminal B subtypes. THR-6E maintained predictive value across endocrine- and chemotherapy-treated, untreated, lymph node-positive, and lymph node-negative subgroups. Beyond prognosis, THR-6E predicted endocrine therapy response in ER+/HER2-, node-negative disease and chemotherapy response in ER+/HER2-, node-positive disease, achieving approximately 70% sensitivity and specificity (AUC=0.714, p=3.6x10-), with consistent performance across taxane-, anthracycline-, and FEC-based regimens (AUCs 0.71-0.72). Single-cell transcriptomic and proteomic analyses demonstrated that THR-6E expression is specific to normal and malignant breast glandular epithelium, preserved during transformation, and further enriched in metastatic disease. Consistent with a cell-of-origin program, THR-6E genes were rarely mutated in breast cancer and retained normal tissue-like co-expression patterns. In the I-SPY2 trial, THR-6E achieved robust prediction of pathologic complete response across multiple treatment arms (AUCs 0.72-0.94), with an overall AUC of 0.741. InterpretationThese results support a cell-of-origin-anchored approach to biomarker development and challenge purely tissue-agnostic models of therapeutic response. THR-6E represents a compact, biologically interpretable signature that extends prognostic and predictive assessment to clinically relevant ER+/HER2- subgroups, including lymph node-positive disease. Its mechanistic grounding and stable performance across cohorts position THR-6E as a complementary tool to existing multigene assays, warranting prospective diagnostic accuracy studies to define its clinical utility and impact on treatment decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.3%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
9
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
11
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.1%
13
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
14
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
15
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
16
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
17
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
19
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
23
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.7%
25
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.5%
27
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%