Back

Odor and bacterial signatures for humans that attract different mosquito species

Marrero, K. M.; Castillo, J. S.; Barbosa, D. L.; Bellantuono, A. J.; Marrero, M. A.; Cid, D.; Costa-da-Silva, A. L.; Verhulst, N. O.; DeGennaro, M.

2026-02-02 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.30.702931 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humans are not equally attractive to mosquitoes, leaving some more vulnerable to mosquito-borne illnesses than others. Body odor differences likely allow mosquitoes to discriminate between humans. Using a uniport olfactometer, we measured the attraction of Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes for each of our 119 participants. Ae. aegypti, but not other species tested, were more attracted to male than female participants. Each of our three species ranked our participants differently, favoring a distinct subset of our cohort. For each species, mosquito attraction rates were used to define high and low attraction human odors and bacterial taxa. For example, Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus attraction was associated with the absence of odors like cyclic alcohols and monoterpenes, while Ae. albopictus attraction was associated with the presence of ketones. Each mosquito species exhibited distinct responses to individual humans, emphasizing both unique and shared cues for targeting their hosts.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.3%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
7
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
8
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.7%
10
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
12
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
13
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
16
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
18
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
19
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Chemical Senses
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
24
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%