Back

PRMT5 inhibitors actively promote metastatic progression of lung adenocarcinoma

Fowler, C. E.; O'Hearn, N.; Henning, N.; Griffen, A.; Mathey-Andrews, N.; Salus, G.; Hazan, R.; Jacks, T.; Burds, A.; Mueller, H.; Soto-Feliciano, Y.; LaFave, L.; Lees, J.

2026-02-02 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.01.30.702866 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Epigenetic changes are a major driver of cancer progression, placing considerable focus on epigenetic regulators as therapeutic targets. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is one such regulator, and numerous PRMT5 inhibitors (PRMT5i) in clinical trials. Despite this, the mechanisms and consequences of PRMT5i-resistance are unknown. Here, we demonstrate that aggressive cancer progression is an inbuilt feature of PRMT5i-resistance acquisition in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Independently-generated resistant cell lines gain dedifferentiation signatures that typify late-stage disease and show increased metastatic potential in vivo. We establish that these state shifts are a direct consequence of PRMT5i action; treatment induces rapid and widespread chromatin rewiring, enabling derepression of late-stage disease states that are stably established in resistant cells. Notably, treatment of lung tumor-bearing mice drives rapid disease advancement without decreasing tumor burden, showing that drug-induced disease progression supersedes any benefits from PRMT5 inhibition in vivo. Furthermore, analyses of human cell lines and patient cohorts supports the notion of PRMT5 inhibition-mediated dedifferentiation. Collectively our data show that PRMT5i can actively promote self-resistance and disease progression in different tumor types. This raises serious concerns for the use of PRMT5i in patients, arguing that clinical studies should consider the possibility of drug-induced plasticity, resistance, and disease advancement.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.