Back

Evolution of neurometabolic frugality in harvester ants

Perl, C. D.; Coto, Z. N.; Johnson, R. A.; Johnson, M. G.; Graber, L. C.; Haas, J.; Waters, J. S.; Traniello, J. F.; Harrison, J. F.

2026-02-02 zoology
10.64898/2026.01.30.702859 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the importance of neurometabolic costs in brain size evolution, quantitative data on brain metabolic rates are lacking. We measured ex vivo brain metabolic rates among species of the ant genus Pogonomyrmex to differentiate the roles of sociality and body size in brain evolution in a phylogenetic context. Worker body size and colony size (a proxy for social complexity) vary significantly among Pogonomyrmex species and were positively correlated. However, sociality was not a determinant of brain energetics. Worker body size strongly affected brain metabolism: 38% of resting metabolic rate was attributable to brain metabolism in species with the smallest workers, compared to 6% in species with the largest workers. More derived species had strikingly lower mass-specific brain metabolic costs, suggesting that increases in worker body size have selected for neurometabolic frugality through reductions in brain mass-specific metabolic rate. Additionally, smaller worker body sizes may require higher brain mass-specific energetic costs to achieve comparable performance by absolutely smaller brains. Our study shows that the social brain hypothesis does not explain patterns of brain size in Pogonomyrmex, but body size and evolutionary history strongly influence brain evolution in regard to both size and metabolic cost.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.8%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.6%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.2%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.3%
5
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
7
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
8
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
11
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
15
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
23
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
28
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
29
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%