Oscillatory and aperiodic neural dynamics shape temporal perception and weighting of perceptual priors in ADHD profiles
Marsicano, G.; Deodato, M.; Melcher, D.
Show abstract
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by an atypically compressed sense of time, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this atypical temporal perception remain poorly understood. Temporal perception depends on the brains ability to organize sensory input into coherent experiences, ensuring perceptual stability despite uncertainty. Oscillations in the alpha band (8-13 Hz) and aperiodic 1/f dynamics have been proposed as key neural mechanisms through which the visual system orchestrates sensory information over time. Individuals with ADHD show atypicalities in these neural dynamics, but how these features relate to ADHD differences in temporal processing remains unexplored. Here, we combined a sustained visual temporal integration task with resting-state EEG to test whether oscillatory and aperiodic neural dynamics jointly account for temporal processing performance across neurotypical participants with self-reported ADHD traits (n = 83). Higher ADHD features in both inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive domains were associated with narrower temporal binding windows and reduced serial dependence on prior perception, indicating sharper temporal resolution but diminished perceptual stability. Resting-state EEG revealed systematically faster individual alpha frequency (IAF) and flatter aperiodic spectra in individuals with higher ADHD traits. Mediation analyses showed that faster IAF explained ADHD-related reductions in temporal integration thresholds and serial dependence, whereas increased neural noise selectively amplified perceptual history-dependent biases. These findings reveal distinct oscillatory and aperiodic neural pathways through which ADHD features shape temporal perception, suggesting a multidimensional neural architecture underlying atypical temporal processing in ADHD.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Movement-Independent Signature of Urgency During Human Perceptual Decision Making 94%
- A shared theta-rhythmic process for selective sampling of environmental information and internally stored information 94%
- Model-based learning deficits in compulsivity are linked to faulty representations of task structure 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduced temporal and spatial stability of neural activity patterns predict cognitive control deficits in children with ADHD 96%
- Action initiation and punishment learning differ from childhood to adolescence while reward learning remains stable 93%
- Anxious vision: Trait-like visual cortical hyperactivity in trait anxiety 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gray Matter Volumetric Correlates of Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Traits in Emerging Adolescents 94%
- Patients Recovering from COVID-19 who Presented Anosmia During their Acute Episode have Behavioral, Functional, and Structural Brain Alterations 92%
- Accessibility to sequential working memory fluctuates unconsciously in a theta phase-dependent manner 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple sequential prediction errors during reward processing in the human brain 94%
- Flexible adaptation of task-positive brain networks predicts efficiency of evidence accumulation 94%
- Dynamic expectations: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of sub-second updates in reward predictions 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.