Back

Predictive metabolomics reveals leaf systemic metabolic signatures associated with floral traits in Camellia

Hocini, F. I.; Prigent, S.; Lerisson, A.; Cordazzo, R.; Muller, C.; Rouveyrol, C.; Cassan, C.; Rey, A.; Fuzzati, N.; Gibon, Y.; Cocandeau, V.; Petriacq, P.

2026-02-02 plant biology
10.64898/2026.01.30.702806 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The genus Camellia comprises more than 200 evergreen species of major economic and ornamental importance, characterised by high morphological and chemical diversity. While several species have been extensively studied for their bioactive compounds, the metabolic basis of floral trait variation across the genus remains poorly understood. In this study, a predictive metabolomics framework was applied to investigate the relationship between leaf metabolic profiles and floral traits, focusing on flower colour and floral form. Leaves from 315 individual trees, including 15 Camellia species and representing 1,160 samples, were analysed by untargeted metabolomics, generating a large-scale metabolic profiling dataset. A dedicated quality control strategy was implemented to ensure analytical stability across multiple injection series and flowering seasons. Penalised generalised linear models were used to uncover robust metabolic predictors associated with floral traits and to evaluate model performance through internal and external validation. Distinct sets of metabolites were associated with flower colour and floral form, with limited overlap between traits. Predictive performance was consistently higher for colour than for floral form, indicating more structured metabolic signatures for chromatic traits. The selected predictors spanned multiple major chemical classes, supporting a systemic organisation of the metabolome rather than reliance on single biosynthetic pathways. Consistently high predictive accuracies were obtained, reaching approximately 87% for both flower colour and floral form, and remaining clearly above the corresponding no-information rates ({approx} 43%). Together, these results demonstrate that leaf metabolomics can be used to robustly predict floral traits in Camellia and highlight the potential of predictive metabolomics as a tool for early phenotype inference, quality control and selection in long-lived ornamental species.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.8%
2
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
6
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
8
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
10
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
15
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
16
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
20
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Food Chemistry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%