Back

Introgression under linear selection on continuous genomes

Foutel-Rodier, F.; Barton, N. H.; Etheridge, A. M.

2026-01-30 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.01.30.702779 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We model the introgression of a genome with many weakly selected linked loci into a large homogeneous population, under the simple assumption that a block of introduced genome has a selective effect proportional to its map length. Using a diffusion approximation, we compute the probability that some part of the initial genome survives the initial phase of the introgression and give the typical length of the surviving blocks. Our results quantify the effect of recombination on selection and drift during an introgression and indicate that the fate of the genome depends on the strength of selection relative to recombination. When selection is positive some parts of the genome are able to survive at large times, but large blocks can only persist if selection is stronger than recombination. Surprisingly, the probability of such a successful introgression is independent of the strength of recombination and is the same as that for a single beneficial allele. Conversely, a deleterious or neutral genome is eventually lost, but at a much slower rate than a single allele with the same selective effect. In this case, surviving blocks are very small. We also consider the introgression of a genome made of a single beneficial allele linked to a deleterious background and compute the amount of deleterious material that hitchhikes during fixation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
21.9%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.8%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.2%
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.2%
7
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
9
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
11
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
12
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
13
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
15
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
18
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
19
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
23
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%
27
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
28
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
30
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%