Back

Calibration of a Closed-loop Model of Porcine Aortic Hemodynamics during Hemorrhage

Sadid, S.; Eden, M. J.; Mobin, F. U.; Gomez, M. K.; Januszko, S.; Burkart, H.; Neff, L. P.; Williams, T. K.; Jordan, J. E.; Rahbar, E.; Figueroa, C. A.

2026-02-02 physiology
10.64898/2026.01.30.702699 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Uncontrolled hemorrhage remains a leading cause of traumatic death, driven by rapid physiological deterioration that is often difficult to detect during the compensated phase. While large-animal models provide critical insights into these dynamics, they are resource-intensive, motivating the need for efficient computational frameworks that can mechanistically interpret cardiovascular responses. We developed and calibrated a closed-loop zero-dimensional (0D) lumped-parameter model (LPM) using hemodynamic data from 43 anesthetized swine subjected to controlled hemorrhage (10%, 20%, or 30% of total blood volume). The computational framework, incorporates a dynamic heart model with a custom time-varying elastance function, a multi-compartment aorta, and distal Windkessel models representing vascular beds. The model was calibrated at discrete time snapshots throughout the 30-minute hemorrhage protocol to reproduce group-averaged experimental waveforms for aortic flow, regional organ flows, and systemic pressures. The calibrated model successfully reproduced experimental hemodynamic targets and waveform morphology across all hemorrhage severities. Analysis of the calibrated parameters revealed distinct physiological mechanisms driving hemodynamic adaptation during hemorrhage: a preferential increase in renal resistance compared to carotid resistance, indicating flow redistribution to vital organs, and a progressive mobilization of venous unstressed volume to sustain cardiac filling. Furthermore, the model captured the distinct shift toward preload limitation state for 30% hemorrhage group. This study establishes a physiologically interpretable in-silico framework capable of predicting both global and regional hemodynamic responses to acute blood loss, providing a validated foundation for future applications in trauma care and resuscitation modeling.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.0%
2
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
5
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
11
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
12
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
14
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
15
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
16
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
23
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
25
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%