BIG-TB: A benchmark for evaluating prediction and interpretability of sequence-based machine learning using *Mycobacterium tuberculosis* genomes
Tasmin, M.; Mohanty, S.; Kulkarni, S.; Farhat, M. R.; Green, A. G.
Show abstract
Foundation models aim to learn useful representations of biological sequences. However, the applicability of these representations for a wide range of tasks, including phenotype prediction and variant discovery, is still in question, in large part due to the relatively small set of benchmark tasks. To this end, we present the Benchmarks for Interpretable prediction from Genomes of Tuberculosis, BIG-TB. We curate over 17,000 genomes with high-quality short read sequencing data and experimentally measured antibiotic resistance phenotypes, combined with a curated list of canonical resistance-conferring variants, and provide these data in an ML-ready format. BIG-TB defines two tasks for interrogating the utility of foundation models: (1) predictive performance of antibiotic resistance phenotypes, and (2) attribution of predictions to known resistance-conferring variants from an expert-curated dataset. Using our benchmark, we show that DNA-based foundation models do not yet outperform simple machine learning baselines (mean test AUC = 0.888 vs. 0.846 for best CNN variant vs. best DNABERT variant across drugs). Our benchmark also supports protein-based models, where performance is worse than DNA-based models due to the loss of representation of non-coding variants, but where foundation models are more competitive with simple ML. We show that the models with highest predictive performance do not necessarily perform the best at canonical resistance variant discovery - indicating that in many cases the improved performance may be due to non-causal associations between variants and phenotype. Finally, we show that the choice of embedding representation has a major impact on foundation model performance, and that representations that average over sequence position perform poorly at both prediction and canonical resistance variant discovery. Overall, BIG-TB provides a new type of benchmark for foundation models of biological sequences, facilitating comparison of representations across multiple tasks. Code available at https://github.com/SAGE-Lab-UMass/Big-TB-benchmark.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Convolutional neural networks quantify antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with diagnostic grade accuracy and predict treatment response 96%
- A convolutional neural network highlights mutations relevant to antimicrobial resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis 95%
- Pre-trained molecular representations enable antimicrobial discovery 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A curriculum learning approach to training antibody language models 94%
- Paraplume: A fast and accurate paratope prediction method provides insights into repertoire-scale binding dynamics 94%
- Highly Accurate Cancer Phenotype Prediction with AKLIMATE, a Stacked Kernel Learner Integrating Multimodal Genomic Data and Pathway Knowledge 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accelerating protein engineering with fitness landscape modeling and reinforcement learning 95%
- Evaluating generalizability of artificial intelligence models for molecular datasets 95%
- TrustAffinity: accurate, reliable and scalable out-of-distribution protein-ligand binding affinity prediction using trustworthy deep learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- PHIStruct: Improving phage-host interaction prediction at low sequence similarity settings using structure-aware protein embeddings 94%
- ProteinBERT: A universal deep-learning model of protein sequence and function 94%
- TUGDA: Task uncertainty guided domain adaptation for robust generalization of cancer drug response prediction from in vitro to in vivo settings 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.