Back

Reinnervation of Muscle Targets Enhances the Separability of Motor Unit Signals Following Peripheral Nerve Transfers

Quinn, K. N.; Wang, S.; Qin, L.; Orsini, A. A.; Griffith, K.; Suresh, R.; Kang, F.; Perkins, P. L.; Joshi, N.; Lowe, A. L.; Tuffaha, S.; Thakor, N. V.

2026-02-02 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.30.700058 bioRxiv
Show abstract

After amputation, advanced prosthetic limbs offer a promising means of restoring motor function. However, state-of-the-art prostheses often rely on aggregate electromyogram (EMG) signals to decode motor intention, which limits their ability to replicate natural limb movements. Decomposing EMG signals into individual motor unit components has shown potential for more natural control, but distinguishing between individual units can be challenging when nearby signals overlap. This study demonstrates that muscle target reinnervation surgeries can naturally increase physical separation between motor unit signals, thereby mitigating this overlap. Reinnervation of individual motor units is evaluated in a rodent hindlimb model after direct nerve-to-muscle implantation. Histological and electrophysiological analyses reveal that structural changes following reinnervation surgery result in beneficial motor unit signal changes, particularly improving spatial separation between motor unit signals compared to those in intact muscle. This spatial separation contributed to fewer instances of complex, overlapping signals in reinnervated muscle recordings. Motor unit signals were leveraged to provide a proof-of-concept of precise control of a virtual prosthesis for the first time after direct nerve-to-muscle implantation surgery. These findings highlight the potential of reinnervated muscle targets as key biological interfaces that facilitate motor unit separation, reducing the burden on decomposition algorithms and improving prosthetic control.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
14.6%
3
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.9%
6
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
8
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
16
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
20
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
23
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%