Analysis of baroreflex activation therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on current era guideline-directed medical therapy
Pham, V.; Gan, A.; Doshi, P.; Valdivia, D.; Wilson, M. L.; Fong, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundGuideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) has been shown to improve mortality and/or symptoms in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Medical devices also play an important role in improved quality of life and overall symptom relief for HFrEF patients. Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT) increases parasympathetic nervous system activity by stimulating the carotid baroreceptors, thereby reducing symptoms. Herein, we analyzed the effects of BAT on hospitalization, atrial arrhythmia (AA), and ventricular arrhythmia (VA) rates. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted consisting of HFrEF patients treated with BAT at Keck Hospital of USC between 11/2014 and 11/2022. We compared median pre-BAT hospitalization, AA, and VA rates to post-BAT rates at both 6- and 12-months using Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests. ResultsAmong 31 patients on BAT, 38.7% met criteria for receiving all four GDMT classes for at least 12 months prior to BAT. Among these, 91.7% had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implanted for [≥]12 months pre- and post-BAT. Average pre- vs. post-BAT all-cause hospitalization rates were significantly different only at 12 months [1.3 {+/-} 1.4 vs 0.3 {+/-} 0.9, respectively (p=0.05)]. Borderline significant pre-post comparisons were noted including decreased VA rate at both 6 and 12 months and increased AA rate at 12-months (p=0.06 for all). ConclusionIn HFrEF patients on full GDMT, BAT was associated with a significant reduction in hospitalization rates at 12 months. There were no significant changes in AA or VA rates.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Competing Risks in Patients with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverters Defibrillators: Global Electrical Heterogeneity and Clinical Outcomes (GEHCO) Study 96%
- Early Experience with Ivabradine for Focal Atrial Tachycardia in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Disease 96%
- High Initial Heart Rate Score is an Independent Predictor of New Atrial High-Rate Episodes in Pacemaker Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 96%
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 95%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Procedural and Pharmacological Interventions on Deep Learning-based Electrocardiographic Markers of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inpatient Outcomes Of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Bridging to Transplantation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 96%
- Association of Heart Failure Subtypes and Atrial fibrillation: Data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study 96%
- Early left ventricular systolic function is a more sensitive predictor of adverse events after heart transplant 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 96%
- The Effect of Medical Therapy on Reducing the Risk of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy 96%
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 95%
- External validation of a claims-based model to predict left ventricular ejection fraction class in patients with heart failure 95%
- Translation of Immunomodulatory Therapy to Treat Chronic Heart Failure: Preclinical Studies to First in Human 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.