Back

Impact of 18FDG-avidity and immunosuppression on idiopathic and genetic cardiomyopathies

Tabaghi, S.; Bevan, G. H.; Hankinson, S.; Gumuser, E. D.; Lal, M.; Pico, M.; Chatterjee, N. A.; Vasbinder, A.; Cheng, R.; Stempien-Otero, A.; Lakdawala, N. K.; Blankstein, R.; Di Carli, M. F.; Levin, B.; Divakaran, S.; Nazer, B.

2026-02-03 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.01.30.26345250 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMyocardial 18fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG)-avidity is frequently seen in patients with genetic cardiomyopathy (CMP), as well as a growing "idiopathic 18FDG-avidity" group of genotype-negative patients who do not clearly have cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). ObjectivesTo determine the prognostic implications of 18FDG-avidity in patients with and without genetic CMP, and the effects of immunosuppression in the latter. MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective study included all patients who were referred for both 18FDG-PET and CMP genetic testing. Patients with acute myocarditis, biopsy-proven sarcoidosis or extracardiac 18FDG-avidity were excluded. We investigated heart failure (HF) composite (left ventricular assist device, heart transplant, HF hospitalization, death) and arrhythmia composite (sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VT/VF), atrio-ventricular block, death) outcomes using survival analysis including Cox proportional hazards modeling and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPWT). ResultsAmong 372 patients, 142 (38%) were 18FDG-avid. Prevalence of genetic CMP among 18FDG-avid patients (12%) was similar to that of 18FDG-negative patients (19%, p=0.07). 18FDG-avidity was associated with increased risk of HF composite (HR 1.69 (1.04-2.75), p=0.034) and arrhythmia composite (HR 1.63 (1.1-2.4), p=0.014) outcomes compared to 18FDG-negative patients. However, these associations were present only in genotype-negative patients, and not in genetic CMP. After IPWT, immunosuppression of 18FDG-avid patients (n=49) was not associated with a reduction in HF (HR 3.31 (1.25, 8.77), p=0.016) or arrhythmia composite outcomes (HR 1.61 (0.79, 3.25), p=0.19) compared with those who were not immunosuppressed (n=93). ConclusionsMyocardial-only 18FDG-avidity is only associated with adverse HF and arrhythmia outcomes in genotype-negative patients who do not clearly have CS. IST does not seem to modify the disease course, suggesting that not all myocardial 18FDG uptake reflects clinically significant inflammation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
4
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
9
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
14
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%