Assessing the impact of social prescribing on health service utilisation: Evidence from the UK
Bu, F.; Kurland, J. S.; Hayes, D.; Fancourt, D.
Show abstract
Social prescribing (SP) is growing rapidly in the United Kingdom and internationally. However, the evidence for its impact is still limited. Drawing pre-post data from longitudinal administrative records (n=4,547), this study aimed to investigate whether SP has the potential to reduce health service utilisation in both primary and secondary care settings. The outcomes were measured using self-reported GP visits, A&E attendances and hospital admissions in the last three months. Data were analysed using Bayesian growth curve modelling, with Poisson or hurdle lognormal models tailored to the specific outcome. Our findings demonstrate consistent patterns of reduced health service utilisation across all outcome measures and model components. Specifically, GP attendance decreased by an average of 1 visit per person (95% CI: -1.07 to -0.95) in three months following SP (53.1% reduction). A&E attendance decreased by 0.04 admissions per person (95% CI: -0.06 to -0.03), equivalent to a 62.6% reduction. And hospital admissions decreased by 0.03 admission per person (95% CI: -0.03 to -0.02), equivalent to a 61.7% reduction. We found limited evidence that the health service utilisation changes differ across socio-demographic groups, indicating a broad applicability of SP interventions.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying markers of health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in UK electronic health records 96%
- Inequality in access to health and care services during lockdown - Findings from the COVID-19 survey in five UK national longitudinal studies 95%
- Trends in inequalities in avoidable hospitalisations across the COVID-19 pandemic: A cohort study of 23.5 million people in England 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Migrants’ primary care utilisation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: An interrupted time series 94%
- Evaluating social and spatial inequalities of large scale rapid lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing in COVID-19 management: An observational study of Liverpool, UK (November 2020 to January 2021) 93%
- Changing probability of experiencing food insecurity by socioeconomic and demographic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in General Practice use and costs with COVID-19 and telehealth initiatives 94%
- Targeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: randomised controlled trial 94%
- Primary care transformation in Scotland: a comparison two cross-sectional national surveys of general practitioners’ views in 2018 and 2023 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting COVID-19 infection hotspots in England using large-scale self-reported data from a mobile application: a prospective, observational study 94%
- Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England during April to September 2020: Results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey 93%
- The effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health impacts of takeaway management zones around schools in six different local authorities across England: a public health modelling study using PRIMEtime 94%
- Excess mortality for care home residents during the first 23 weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a national cohort study 92%
- The UK Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and changes in diet, physical activity and sleep during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from eight longitudinal studies 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.