Translational PBPK-QSP modeling platform for antibody-drug conjugates (ADC): within-target and cross-pathway validation to bridge preclinical and clinical results
Meid, A.; Leiva-Escobar, I.; Choi, S.-L.; Valente, D.
Show abstract
We designed a platform model that integrates physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling with quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) to bridge translational challenges in antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) development. The PBPK-QSP platform model was developed for the ADC trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in breast cancer patients. This mechanistic framework facilitates translation across preclinical in vitro experiments, in vivo studies, and clinical trials, supporting decision-making for novel ADCs. The PBPK-QSP model adequately predicts preclinical and clinical PK and PD data from two additional ADCs: trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd) and tusamitamab ravtansine. For within-target validation with T-Dxd in breast cancer, despite extensive preclinical calibration, efficacy predictions were initially overly optimistic compared to T-DM1 validation experience with the model and aggregated phase II trial data. Individual patient data from a phase II T-Dxd trial allowed evaluation of model performance and quantification of translational uncertainty in predicting clinical outcomes using preclinical experiments. Cross-pathway validation with tusamitamab ravtansine in non-small cell lung cancer has revealed the importance of incorporating a resistance module to describe clinical efficacy adequately. Clinical trial simulations for tusamitamab ravtansine subsequently inform that alternative fractional dosing could offer a potential efficacy advantage compared to existing clinical dosing. We integrated these insights into a practical recommended workflow for translational development programs, which addresses the key challenges in parameter estimation, data requirements, and uncertainty quantification in the key system parameters for each indication and cancer type. Ultimately, integrating an interactive modeling platform with a structured workflow to mitigate the risks of human translation and to potentially improve the clinical benefits of novel ADCs in oncology drug development.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Model-informed Deep Q-Networks to Guide Infliximab Dosing in Pediatric Crohn's Disease 92%
- Prioritisation of potential anti-SARS-CoV-2 drug repurposing opportunities based on ability to achieve adequate target site concentrations derived from their established human pharmacokinetics 92%
- Innovative Randomized Phase 1 Study and Dosing Regimen Selection to Accelerate and Inform Pivotal COVID-19 Trial of Nirmatrelvir 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- In silico PK predictions in Drug Discovery: Benchmarking of Strategies to Integrate Machine Learning with Empiric and Mechanistic PK modelling 94%
- A long-acting GDF15 analog causes robust, sustained weight loss and reduction of food intake in an obese non-human primate model 91%
- A Framework to Quantify Disparities in Pharmacogenomic Treatment Concordance and Drug Response Outcomes 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- DigiLoCS: A Leap Forward in Predictive Organ-on-Chip Simulations 95%
- Toward in vivo-relevant hERG safety assessment and mitigation strategies based on relationships between non-equilibrium blocker binding, three-dimensional channel-blocker interactions, dynamic occupancy, dynamic exposure, and cellular arrhythmia 91%
- A 3D brain unit model to further improve prediction of local drug distribution within the brain 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.