Back

Translational PBPK-QSP modeling platform for antibody-drug conjugates (ADC): within-target and cross-pathway validation to bridge preclinical and clinical results

Meid, A.; Leiva-Escobar, I.; Choi, S.-L.; Valente, D.

2026-02-01 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2026.01.30.26345218 medRxiv
Show abstract

We designed a platform model that integrates physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling with quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) to bridge translational challenges in antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) development. The PBPK-QSP platform model was developed for the ADC trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in breast cancer patients. This mechanistic framework facilitates translation across preclinical in vitro experiments, in vivo studies, and clinical trials, supporting decision-making for novel ADCs. The PBPK-QSP model adequately predicts preclinical and clinical PK and PD data from two additional ADCs: trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd) and tusamitamab ravtansine. For within-target validation with T-Dxd in breast cancer, despite extensive preclinical calibration, efficacy predictions were initially overly optimistic compared to T-DM1 validation experience with the model and aggregated phase II trial data. Individual patient data from a phase II T-Dxd trial allowed evaluation of model performance and quantification of translational uncertainty in predicting clinical outcomes using preclinical experiments. Cross-pathway validation with tusamitamab ravtansine in non-small cell lung cancer has revealed the importance of incorporating a resistance module to describe clinical efficacy adequately. Clinical trial simulations for tusamitamab ravtansine subsequently inform that alternative fractional dosing could offer a potential efficacy advantage compared to existing clinical dosing. We integrated these insights into a practical recommended workflow for translational development programs, which addresses the key challenges in parameter estimation, data requirements, and uncertainty quantification in the key system parameters for each indication and cancer type. Ultimately, integrating an interactive modeling platform with a structured workflow to mitigate the risks of human translation and to potentially improve the clinical benefits of novel ADCs in oncology drug development.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
3
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
4
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
9
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
10
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
11
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
12
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
17
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
20
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%