Leveraging the genetics of human face shape boosts the discovery of orofacial cleft risk loci
Herrick, N.; Goovaerts, S.; Manchel, A.; Lee, M. K.; Zhang, X.; Davies, A.; Carlson, J. C.; Leslie-Clarkson, E. J.; Lewis, S. J.; Marazita, M. L.; Cotney, J.; Claes, P.; Shaffer, J. R.; Weinberg, S. M.
Show abstract
Several lines of evidence suggest that normal-range facial features and nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (OFCs) exhibit a shared genetic basis. Approaches designed to leverage this relationship hold the possibility of revealing new OFC risk loci by boosting discovery power. To test this idea, we applied a pleiotropy-informed GWAS method (cFDR-GWAS) with summary statistics from large, independent European GWASs of normal facial shape (n=4,680; n=3,566) and nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (nsCL/P, n=3,969). The cFDR approach identified 21 independent genomic loci significantly associated with nsCL/P, providing further evidence of the interconnected genetic architecture between these traits. The five original nsCL/P GWAS signals were detected and joined by nine additional loci previously implicated in other OFC association studies. The remaining seven loci represent new nsCL/P genomic regions, and three of these replicated (P < 0.05) in an independent nsCL/P cohort: ASPSCR1, MSX2, and RALYL. A relaxed 10% cFDR-GWAS threshold identified 15 more independent loci with comparable effect sizes to those detected at the strict 5% threshold, two of which replicated: FHOD3 and SMARCA2. Gene expression patterns in major cell types and spatial transcriptomics data highlighted our gene candidates roles in craniofacial development. In conclusion, the application of an empirical Bayesian strategy to draw on association signals from genetically related traits can boost the power to identify and prioritize OFC risk loci missed by agnostic gene mapping approaches. These results hold promise that the cFDR-GWAS approach may be able to enhance our understanding of the genetic architecture of other structural birth defects.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rare variants in PRKCI cause Van der Woude syndrome and other features of peridermopathy 95%
- Disentangling mechanisms behind the pleiotropic effects of proximal 16p11.2 BP4-5 CNVs 94%
- The landscape of autosomal-recessive pathogenic variants in European populations reveals phenotype-specific effects 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification and validation of novel candidate risk genes in endocytic vesicular trafficking associated with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistulas 93%
- Stability of Polygenic Scores Across Discovery Genome-Wide Association Studies 93%
- Ancestral diversity improves discovery and fine-mapping of genetic loci for anthropometric traits - the Hispanic/Latino Anthropometry Consortium 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The genetic and phenotypic correlates of neonatal Complement Component 3 and 4 protein concentrations with a focus on psychiatric and autoimmune disorders 94%
- Effects of gene dosage on cognitive ability: A function-based association study across brain and non-brain processes 93%
- Leveraging global multi-ancestry meta-analysis in the study of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis genetics 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Syndrome-informed phenotyping identifies a polygenic background for achondroplasia-like facial variation in the general population 98%
- Joint Multi-Ancestry and Admixed GWAS Reveals the Complex Genetics behind Human Cranial Vault Shape 95%
- Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.