Back

A Prospective Natural History Study Protocol for Clinical Trial Readiness in Synaptic Disorders

McKee, J. L.; Ruggiero, S. M.; Cunningham, K.; Coyne, J.; McSalley, I.; Kaufmann, M. C.; Bane, B.; Chisari, T.; Toib, J.; Glatts, C.; Tefft, S.; Orlando, J. M.; Padmanabhan, V.; Gonzalez, A. K.; Harrison, A.; Woo, C.; Zbikowski, S. A.; Dhaduk, R.; Mercurio, J.; McCarthy, M.; Magielski, J. H.; Grinspan, Z.; Abbott, M.; Knowles, J.; Chao, H.-T. M.; Xiong, K.; Berry-Kravis, E.; Tabarestani, S.; Graglia, J. M.; Helde, K.; McNamar, V.; Son Rigby, C.; Goss, J.; Demarest, S.; Miele, A.; Prosser, B.; Boland, M. J.; Pierce, S. R.; Helbig, I.

2026-02-02 neurology
10.64898/2026.01.30.26344887 medRxiv
Show abstract

Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSObjectiveC_ST_ABSSTXBP1-Related Disorders (STXBP1-RD) and SYNGAP1-Related Disorder (SYNGAP1-RD) are two common genetic synaptopathies, leading to epilepsy, developmental delay, and intellectual disability. Both STXBP1-RD and SYNGAP1-RD are potential targets for disease-modifying therapies, but there is limited information in the literature describing the natural history of either disorder, which impedes outcome selection for future clinical trials. The objective of this study is to develop a framework to better define and outline the clinical spectrum and longitudinal trajectories of STXBP1-RD and SYNGAP1-RD natural history, including development, behavior, seizure histories, and electrophysiology. MethodsHere, we describe a protocol, regulatory structure, and supportive preliminary data for multi-center, prospective natural history studies of STXBP1-RD (STARR) and SYNGAP1-RD (ProMMiS). The protocols incorporate gold-standard clinician-assessed outcome measures including the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 4th edition, Gross Motor Function Measure-66, and fine motor domains of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales 3rd Edition, parent reported outcome measures (PROMs), epilepsy histories, and biomarker exploration. To date, the study has enrolled 164 individuals with STXBP1-RD and 159 with SYNGAP1-RD, with ongoing longitudinal assessments every 6 months in a subset of approximately 200 total individuals across both disorders. ResultsOur data support that existing developmental measures are feasible, informative, and show minimal floor or ceiling effects. Furthermore, we demonstrate that medical record-based seizure history reconstruction reveals unique epilepsy trajectories while minimizing burden to families. We observe disease-specific patterns of developmental performance and distinct longitudinal seizure dynamics, highlighting the need for data generation in a gene/disorder-specific manner for clinical trial readiness. SignificanceIn summary, we present a feasible natural history protocol with prospective data for two complex neurodevelopmental disorders with natural histories that have previously been incompletely characterized, within a regulatory framework that will support the use of these data to expedite clinical trial development. Key PointsO_LISTXBP1-Related Disorder (STXBP1-RD) and SYNGAP1-Related Disorder (SYNGAP1-RD) are two common genetic causes of epilepsy, developmental delay, and intellectual disability. C_LIO_LISTXBP1-RD and SYNGAP1-RD are potential targets for drug and gene therapy, but there is limited information in the literature describing the natural history of either disorder which impedes the development of possible therapeutics. C_LIO_LIThe current paper is a description of a prospective natural history study of STXBP1-RD and SYNGAP1-RD which will assess the clinical spectrum of each disorder through detailed developmental assessments, seizure histories, behavioral assessments, and electronic medical record reconstruction. C_LIO_LIBy studying STXBP1-RD and SYNGAP1-RD with both cross sectional and longitudinal assessments, we aim to improve clinical trial readiness so that potential treatments can be assessed expeditiously. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.3%
2
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.9%
3
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
4
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Epilepsia Open
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
9
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
14
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
17
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
18
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
19
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
20
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
22
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
26
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%