Back

Predicting early bactericidal activity of tuberculosis drug combinations using a translational pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling approach

de Castro Suarez, N.; Nuermberger, E. L.; Ernest, J.; Savic, R. M.

2026-02-02 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.01.29.702705 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phase IIa pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) trials typically assess the early bactericidal activity (EBA) of monotherapy for over 14 days. However, few studies have evaluated drug combinations, even though optimal monotherapy doses may not directly translate to combinations. Translational pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling has shown promise in predicting human treatment responses based on preclinical monotherapy data; however, its application in drug combinations remains limited. This study aimed to extend and validate our previously developed translational monotherapy PK-PD modeling platform to predict the EBA of two-drug combinations. Interactions between bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and pyrazinamide were characterized using two modeling approaches: the empirical SUPER method and the mechanistic General Pharmacodynamic Interaction model. Both approaches were independently linked to our translational platform and validated using mouse data and Phase IIa clinical results from the NC-001 study. Both modeling methods identified consistent interaction patterns, including antagonistic interactions when bedaquiline was combined with either pretomanid or linezolid. Pyrazinamide has emerged as the most effective companion for both bedaquiline and pretomanid. Our platform reasonably predicted 14-day clinical sputum colony-forming unit counts for multiple two-drug combinations, with most observations falling within the 95% prediction intervals, supporting its use in accelerating regimen development. Our study demonstrated that the translational PK-PD platform reliably predicts both short- and long-term outcomes for combinations, regardless of the interaction model. This supports its application across drug development stages to inform dose selection and effective companion drugs for anti-TB therapies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.5%
3
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.2%
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
6
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
10
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
14
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
17
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
19
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
26
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.5%
29
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%