Back

Conserved Residues in the Gα interface show subtype specificity in Gβγ coupling

Wei, W.; Taylor, H. D.; Ma, N.; Rodin, A. S.; Branciamore, S.; Dohlman, H. G.; Vaidehi, N.

2026-01-30 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.01.29.702674 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although the structural basis of selective G-protein coupling to G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is well characterized, the mechanisms underlying selective interactions between distinct G subtypes (Gs, Gi, Gq, and G12/13) and G{beta}{gamma} remain poorly understood. While conserved residues in G subtypes are often assumed to have similar functions, they may instead modulate coupling selectivity by altering the frequency and stability of contacts at the G:G{beta}{gamma} interface. Using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations combined with the interpretable machine learning method, Bayesian Network Model (BNM), and protein-protein proximity (BRET) assays, we show that conserved residues in the two closely related Gi/o and Gq/11 subfamilies contribute differentially to G{beta}{gamma} coupling. These conserved residue "hotspots" on Gi and Gq produced divergent functional effects on G{beta}{gamma} coupling, indicating that conservation does not ensure functional equivalence. These findings suggest that local microenvironment and paralog-specific allosteric coupling shape how conserved interface residues contribute to protein-protein coupling. The framework provides a systematic approach for dissecting subtype-specific mechanisms, with implications for drug design and for annotating the functional relevance of disease-associated variants. The computational methods used here are broadly applicable to other homologous protein families.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.1%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.1%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.4%
5
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
6
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.2%
8
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.9%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
13
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
14
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
16
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
17
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
21
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%