Back

Predicting neutron radiation exposure characteristics from an in vitro human skin model using RNA-seq

Gardner, M. W.; LeSassier, D. S.; Gil, J. C.; Werth, J. C.; Pont, M. N.; Garty, G.; Scheuermann, E. A.; Turner, H. C.; Cocola, P. J.; Grice, C.; June, V. M.; Vaccaro, C. A.; Tashner, B. E.; Hewitt, F. C.

2026-01-30 genomics
10.64898/2026.01.29.702673 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate assessment of low-dose neutron radiation exposure remains a central challenge in biodosimetry, particularly for applications requiring non-invasive sample types such as skin. Here, we characterized the transcriptional response of a three-dimensional in vitro human skin model (EpiDermFT) to neutron irradiation at doses up to 0.75 Gy, measured from pre-exposure through a 14-day post-exposure period. RNA sequencing revealed greater than 800 significantly altered genes, including upregulation of FOS, FOSB, CDKN1A, MDM2, and GADD45A, and downregulation of NRG1, H3C11, and CENPX. Gene ontology enrichment indicated activation of DNA damage checkpoint signaling, cell cycle arrest, and stress-response pathways, alongside suppression of nucleosome assembly and DNA replication processes. Machine learning models trained on transcriptomic features exhibited strong predictive performance across biodosimetric endpoints. Classification models accurately distinguished irradiated from sham samples (AUC > 0.99), and regression models achieved high accuracy for estimating both absorbed dose (R2 = 0.97) and days post-exposure (R2 = 0.99). The latter, while highly predictive, may partially reflect transcriptional shifts associated with progressive degradation of the in vitro tissue model over time. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that RNA-based molecular signatures from human skin tissue provide a robust framework for quantitative estimation of neutron radiation exposure and temporal response dynamics.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
3
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
5
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.2%
10
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
14
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
16
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
24
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
29
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
30
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%