Toward identification of common DNA repair process in mutational signatures
Wojtowicz, D.; Wierzbinski, M.; Hoinka, J.; Sharan, R.; Przytycka, T. M.
Show abstract
Mutational signatures are characteristic patterns of mutation frequencies assumed to be generated by specific mutagenic processes. A growing catalog of mutational signatures exists, but tools to systematically infer relationships between them remain limited. A mutational signature can be viewed as the combined outcome of two processes: DNA damage and DNA repair. Since cancer therapies often target DNA repair, inferring DNA repair pathways is important for treatment design, even when the mutagenic process is unknown. Here, we model the DNA repair step as a transformation, called RePrint, from damaged nucleotides to repair-related mutation patterns conditioned on the damage. We demonstrate that RePrint similarity is indicative of shared DNA repair mechanisms, enabling guilt-by-association prediction of DNA repair pathways. Using experimentally annotated signatures from environmental exposures and CRISPR gene knockouts as gold standards, we demonstrate that RePrint-based clustering consistently outperforms signature-based clustering across multiple evaluation metrics. We validate several guilt-by-association predictions with literature evidence, demonstrating RePrints ability to identify shared repair mechanisms even among signatures with divergent mutational profiles. RePrint provides the first approach to systematically transfer DNA repair information between signatures, opening doors to understanding signatures of unknown origin and informing therapeutic strategies. An open-source implementation is available at https://github.com/wojtowicz-lab/RePrintPy
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Crosstalk between repair pathways elicits Double-Strand Breaks in alkylated DNA: implications for the action of temozolomide 93%
- Statistical inference reveals the role of length, breathing, and nucleotide identity in V(D)J nucleotide trimming 93%
- Deep learning linking mechanistic models to single-cell transcriptomics data reveals transcriptional bursting in response to DNA damage 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning probabilistic protein-DNA recognition codes from DNA-binding specificities using structural mappings 93%
- Linking the dynamics of chromatin occupancy and transcription with predictive models 92%
- Reconstruction of clone- and haplotype-specific cancer genome karyotypes from bulk tumor samples 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcription-coupled repair and mismatch repair contribute towards preserving genome integrity at mononucleotide repeat tracts 94%
- Learning mutational signatures and their multidimensional genomic properties with TensorSignatures 93%
- Prediction and functional interpretation of inter-chromosomal genome architecture from DNA sequence with TwinC 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.