Back

A Detailed Model for Understanding the Human Neocortex

Zulaica, N. B.; Kanari, L.; Sood, V.; Rai, P.; Arnaudon, A.; Shi, Y.; Mange, D.; Van Geit, W.; Zbili, M.; Reva, M.; Boci, E.; Perin, R.; Pezzoli, M.; Benavides-Piccione, R.; DeFelipe, J.; Mertens, E.; de Kock, C. P. J.; Segev, I.; Markram, H.; Reimann, M. W.

2026-01-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.29.702592 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The neocortex underlies cognitive abilities that set humans apart from other species. Although Ramon y Cajal initiated its study in the 19th century, much about its fundamental properties remain poorly understood. Biologically detail modeling, has been shown to serve as a tool to understand the modeled system better. By comparing computational models for different species we can highlight functional differences between them, find their anatomical or physiological basis and thus improve our understanding of cortical function. In this study we built a detailed model of a human cortical microcircuit following an established workflow. We compared the human data and results against a previously published reconstruction of rat cortical circuitry. To parametrize the human model, we gathered new original data on human morphological reconstructions, axonal bouton densities, single cell and synaptic recordings. We combined them with data available in the literature and open-sourced databases. We also developed various strategies to overcome the missing data, such as generalizing or adapting data from rodents. The resulting model consists of seven columnar units with similar characteristics. Each column has a radius of 476 {micro}m, a height of 2622 {micro}m, a volume of 1.86 mm3, a total cell density of 24,186 cells/mm3, on the order of 35,000 cells, around 12 million connections and approximately 47 million synapses. Comparing the rat and the human model showed that the human cortex is less dense in terms of cell bodies than the rodent cortex. Human cells have more complex branching, but lower bouton densities than rodent cells. However, the number of connections between cell types is similar.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.5%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.9%
3
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
5
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.5%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
12
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
15
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.0%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
25
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
26
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
Neuroscience Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
30
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%