A Detailed Model for Understanding the Human Neocortex
Zulaica, N. B.; Kanari, L.; Sood, V.; Rai, P.; Arnaudon, A.; Shi, Y.; Mange, D.; Van Geit, W.; Zbili, M.; Reva, M.; Boci, E.; Perin, R.; Pezzoli, M.; Benavides-Piccione, R.; DeFelipe, J.; Mertens, E.; de Kock, C. P. J.; Segev, I.; Markram, H.; Reimann, M. W.
Show abstract
The neocortex underlies cognitive abilities that set humans apart from other species. Although Ramon y Cajal initiated its study in the 19th century, much about its fundamental properties remain poorly understood. Biologically detail modeling, has been shown to serve as a tool to understand the modeled system better. By comparing computational models for different species we can highlight functional differences between them, find their anatomical or physiological basis and thus improve our understanding of cortical function. In this study we built a detailed model of a human cortical microcircuit following an established workflow. We compared the human data and results against a previously published reconstruction of rat cortical circuitry. To parametrize the human model, we gathered new original data on human morphological reconstructions, axonal bouton densities, single cell and synaptic recordings. We combined them with data available in the literature and open-sourced databases. We also developed various strategies to overcome the missing data, such as generalizing or adapting data from rodents. The resulting model consists of seven columnar units with similar characteristics. Each column has a radius of 476 {micro}m, a height of 2622 {micro}m, a volume of 1.86 mm3, a total cell density of 24,186 cells/mm3, on the order of 35,000 cells, around 12 million connections and approximately 47 million synapses. Comparing the rat and the human model showed that the human cortex is less dense in terms of cell bodies than the rodent cortex. Human cells have more complex branching, but lower bouton densities than rodent cells. However, the number of connections between cell types is similar.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.