Back

Morph bias in inflorescences and individual plants reduces opportunities for geitonogamy in a monomorphic enantiostylous species

S B, R.; Gowda, V.

2026-01-30 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.29.702576 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIEvolution of enantiostyly, a stylar polymorphism characterised by left- or right-handed flowers, is predicted to counter selfing through disassortative pollen movement. However, in monomorphic enantiostyly, both morphs are present on the same individual, and geitonogamy has been proposed to depend on the morph ratio within an individual. C_LIO_LIUsing a monomorphic enantiostylous Didymocarpus podocarpus (Gesneriaceae) endemic to the Eastern Himalayas, we hypothesised that geitonogamous events would be reduced when plants have a biased morph ratio, due to disassortative pollen movement. We first established natural morph ratios and reproductive compatibilities of the morphs. We next examined the role of morph ratios in pollen movement by recording pollinator visitation patterns using visual observations and quantum dots. C_LIO_LIOur results show that inflorescences and individual plants exhibit biased morph ratios, while the population maintains an isoplethic ratio. Pollen transfer was higher between morphs than within morphs, and pollination success in inter-morph treatments was higher than in intra-morph treatments. Finally, inter-morph switches by the pollinator within plants decreased with an increase in morph bias. C_LIO_LIWe show that biased morph ratios within plants, combined with disassortative pollen movement, can limit the occurrence of geitonogamous events, thus acting as a strategy to increase pollination success. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.5%
2
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.3%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.3%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.1%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.7%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
10
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
17
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
18
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
26
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
29
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%