Back

Push-and-pull protein dynamics leads to log-normal synaptic sizes and probabilistic multi-spine plasticity

Petkovic, J.; Eggl, M.; Pathirana, D.; Chater, T. E.; Hasenauer, J.; Rizzoli, S.; Tchumatchenko, T.

2026-01-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.29.702571 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A typical neuron receives thousands of inputs and is able to adapt the strength of its synapses to store new information and meet ongoing computational demands. The synaptic response to plasticity induction is stochastic and spatially structured but is traditionally described by deterministic models representing the "average" dynamics. Growing experimental evidence indicates that not only the stimulation protocol determines the plasticity outcome but that the initial synaptic sizes, their fluctuations, and the spatial competition for the plasticity-relevant proteins play a decisive role. This probabilistic perspective makes it hard to predict the fate of a given synapse and requires a conceptual shift from a single synapse view to a probabilistic multi-spine competitive process where the plasticity needs and the available resources are considered together. Here, we propose a data-driven modeling framework able to predict collective plasticity outcomes along a dendrite based on the initial size, the number, and the spatial distance between simultaneously stimulated synapses. Our data analysis reveals a log-normal distribution of protein numbers for many plasticity-mediating proteins and shows that this log-normal protein allocation constrains and controls the collective plasticity outcome across multiple stimulated and non-stimulated synapses while preserving a global size distribution. Our findings highlight how local stochastic processes and global protein allocation rules give rise to synaptic plasticity outcomes, offering a new framework to understand and predict dendritic computation.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
61.9%
50% of probability mass above
2
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
3
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
4
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
8
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.7%
9
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
10
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
11
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
12
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
13
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
14
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.7%
18
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.5%