Back

Gene-environment interactions govern early regeneration in fir and beech: evidence from participatory provenance trials across Europe

Csillery, K.; Charlet de Sauvage, J.; Caduff, M.; Alt, J.; Bison, M.; Celik, M.; Ponta, N.; Wegmann, D.

2026-01-30 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.01.29.702314 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIForest regeneration is shaped by strong demographic filters during germination and early establishment, yet the relative contributions of provenance and environment remain poorly resolved under natural conditions. C_LIO_LIWe combined climate-chamber trials with a continental-scale, field-based citizen science seed-sowing experiment to quantify germination, early phenological development, and three-year post-germination survival fir (Abies spp.) and beech (Fagus spp.) provenances across Europe. Using mixed-effects models and a state-based Markov framework to reconstruct phenological trajectories, we quantified successive demographic filters from seed to established seedling. C_LIO_LIGermination was structured by genotype-by-environment interactions (G x E) in both genera, but with contrasting expression: fir showed broadly parallel environmental responses among provenances and partial concordance between climate-chamber and field, whereas beech showed strong provenance-by-environment responses and weak predictability from controlled conditions. Seed weight was a key axis in beech (lighter seeds germinated more and developed faster), but confounded with geographic differentiation in fir. C_LIO_LIIn contrast to germination, post-establishment survival was dominated by site-level environmental filtering with limited consistent provenance effects, revealing a life-stage shift from fine-scale G x E during germination and early development to broader environmental control of survival--an important consideration for regeneration--based management and assisted migration. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.