Back

Safeguarding Against Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries for Dark Skin Tones: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Ocampo, A.

2026-02-02 nursing
10.64898/2026.01.29.26345180 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThe quality improvement (QI) initiative integrated the use of the Monk Skin Tone (MST) scale into routine nursing skin assessments to reduce hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) among patients with dark skin tones (DST). The project addressed disparities in early detection of subtle skin changes, which are less visible in DST, and sought to advance equity in patient safety. Participants and SettingThe initiative was implemented in 900-bed, academic Level I trauma hospital in Los Angeles, California. Seventy-nine registered nurses (RNs) from the Medical Unit participated, excluding agency, float pool, and nurse residency program nurses. Implementation phase was from May to July 2025. ApproachGuided by the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) framework, the MST scale was embedded into comprehensive skin assessment protocols. RNs received structured training and education, laminated MST badge buddies, and documentation reinforcement within the electronic health record (EHR). Compliance was monitored through chart audits and electronic data capture documentation review. OutcomesPre-implementation HAPI incidence was 3.18 per 1,000 patient days. Post-implementation, incidence decreased to 0.18, representing a 94% reduction. Among DST patients, only 2% developed HAPIs. Nursing compliance with MST documentation reached 95%, surpassing the 60% benchmark. Implications for PracticeIntegration of the MST scale improved documentation accuracy, reduced disparities in PI detection, and enhanced nurse compliance in skin assessments and documentation. Sustained adoption requires embedding MST training into staff onboarding, continuous education, and EHR workflows. Expansion across inpatient and outpatient settings may further advance equity, patient safety, and organizational performance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.8%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
13.0%
3
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
4
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
7
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
8
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
9
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
10
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
13
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
16
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.2%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
23
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
24
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%