Statin Eligibility Disparities with Transition from the Pooled Cohort Equations to the AHA PREVENT
Yan, X.; Huang, Q.; Li, J.; Husby, H.; Jose, P. O.; Kenkare, P.; Solomon, M. D.; Rodriguez, F.; Bacong, A. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe 2023 AHA PREVENT (Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events) equations were expected to replace the 2013 ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) for estimating atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. The real-world implications of this transition on statin eligibility and disparity are unknown. ObjectivesTo evaluate how transitioning from PCE to AHA PREVENT alters statin eligibility across risk thresholds and racial and ethnic subgroups. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRetrospective cohort analyses of adults aged 40-75 years without diabetes, LDL-C [≥]190 mg/dL, or prior statin use from Sutter Health (2010-2024) and NHANES (2011-2020). Ten-year ASCVD risk was estimated using both equations. Weighted analyses were applied to NHANES data. Main Outcomes and MeasuresStatin eligibility at PREVENT-ASCVD thresholds (3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7.5%) compared with PCE [≥]7.5%, and the proportion of individuals reclassified below PREVENT-ASCVD thresholds. ResultsAmong 229,839 Sutter Health patients (mean age 53.7 years; 53.8% women), 22.3% had PCE risk [≥]7.5%. Among individuals above PREVENT-ASCVD 5% threshold level (18.0% in the cohort) 94.7% also met PCE criteria. However, 6.3% (11,866) would lose eligibility, disproportionately affecting non-Hispanic Black adults (18.7%) compared with non-Hispanic Asian adults (3.3%) among individuals who were below PREVENT-ASCVD 5% threshold. In NHANES (n=3,226; representing 32.7 million adults), 9.4% overall and 21.7% of non-Hispanic Black adults with PCE [≥]7.5% lost eligibility at PREVENT-ASCVD 5% threshold level. ConclusionsTransitioning from PCE to PREVENT recalibrates statin eligibility and may disproportionately affect non-Hispanic Black adults. Disparity-focused monitoring is essential for clinical implementation of this new model.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 96%
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 96%
- Age-stratified Prevalence and Relative Prognostic Significance of Traditional Atherosclerotic Risk Factors: A Report from the Nationwide Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Japan 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Awareness, Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults with Hypertension in the United States: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Analysis from 2011 to 2018 95%
- Projected Impact of Nonpharmacologic Management of Stage 1 Hypertension Among Lower-Risk US Adults 94%
- Elevated blood pressure in the emergency department - a risk factor for incident cardiovascular disease: An EHR-based cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential impact of Covid-19 on incidence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases in acute, post-acute and long Covid-19: population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom 93%
- Sociodemographic Characteristics and Longitudinal Progression of Multimorbidity: A Multistate Modelling Analysis of a Large Primary Care Records Dataset in England 91%
- Cost-effectiveness of leveraging existing HIV primary health systems and community health workers for hypertension screening and treatment in Africa: an individual-based modelling study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.