Back

Nonlinear dynamic genetic regulation identifies peripheral drivers of neurodegenerative disease progression

Luo, J.; Wu, H.; Du, W.; Liu, G.

2026-01-30 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.01.29.26345161 medRxiv
Show abstract

The dynamic genetic regulation of gene expression during the progression of common neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) remains poorly characterized, obscuring the genetic architecture of longitudinal clinical traits. Here, we present 2sGen-GPS, a two-stage genetic Granger temporal causality framework designed to integrate genetic variants, intermediate longitudinal molecular traits, and disease progression phenotypes. In the discovery stage, we utilized multivariate polynomial temporal genetic association (MPTGA) analysis of peripheral blood to identify 774,533 time-dependent cis-eQTLs (11,936 eGenes), enabling the imputation of individual-level longitudinal expression trajectories. In the second stage, these imputed profiles were linked to NDD phenotypes to infer temporal causal relationships. Applying 2sGen-GPS to Parkinsons disease multi-omics cohorts, we identified a peripheral-to-central regulatory axis; specifically, the rs11241912-driven temporal expression of C5orf63 exhibits a lagged causal association with cerebrospinal fluid LRP1 levels and motor symptom progression. Cross-regional single-cell analysis further revealed that rs11241912 carriers harbor a localized compensatory signature in excitatory neurons of the globus pallidus interna, characterized by the up-regulation of dopamine receptor signaling pathways. Extending 2sGen-GPS to Alzheimers disease, we identified 328 genes linked to cognitive decline and prioritized drug compounds capable of reversing these expression signatures. Our study elucidates how dynamic genetic effects shape the trajectories of NDD-related traits and nominates peripherally accessible, causal genes as promising therapeutic targets for modulating disease progression.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.