Back

Development and implementation of an AI system for clinical toxicology sign-outs

Laha, N.; Keebaugh, M.; Liao, H.-C.; Amankwaa, B.; Adesoye, O.; Pablo, A.; Phipps, W. S.; Hoofnagle, A. N.; Baird, G. S.; Mathias, P. C.; Foy, B. H.

2026-01-30 toxicology
10.64898/2026.01.29.26345133 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundModern natural language tools have potential to improve clinical workflows, but few have been successfully deployed in practice. Here, we present the development, deployment, and evaluation of an AI language tool for generating preliminary clinical sign-outs in a urine drug testing service. MethodsLarge language models (LLMs) were used to extract substance use patterns from 83,553 urine drug test interpretations. We then trained an AI model using these data to predict substance use from qualitative and quantitative urine testing results. Predicted substance use patterns were used to create preliminary clinical sign-out statements, which were then integrated into an existing clinical workflow. Pre- and post-deployment user studies were performed to evaluate model performance and user experience within this workflow. ResultsLLM-based extraction of substance-use patterns was 99.9% accurate, outperforming human labelling. Substance use prediction was similarly accurate, with area under the ROC curve > 0.99 across 33 drug categories. Workflow integration reduced clinical sign-out times by 65s per case (51% efficiency gain), with the greatest benefits seen for less experienced users. ConclusionsAI-based interpretation of urine drug testing was fast and accurate, providing significant efficiency gains to the clinical service. This demonstrates that natural language tool integration can provide substantial clinical benefit, without comprising quality of care.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
24.0%
2
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
3
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
4
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.6%
5
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
6
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
7
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
10
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
14
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
15
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
27
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
30
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%