Back

Assessing AI tool use in among New York State clinicians

Galfano, A.; Barbosu, C. M.; Aladin, B.; Rivera, I.; Dye, T. D. V.

2026-01-30 primary care research
10.64898/2026.01.29.26345129 medRxiv
Show abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is dramatically changing the healthcare landscape by providing patients, clinicians, administrators, and public health professionals with tools aiming to improve efficiency, outcomes, and experience in health. As elsewhere, New York State (NYS) experiences high demand for - and high investment in - transformation in healthcare with AI tools, though little is known about clinicians use and interest in adopting AI tools in their work. A large share of the nations future primary care clinicians train and work in NYS, and the states ability to establish clear policies, provide tools, and elevate AI competency have implications for care delivery nationally. As a result, we undertook this analysis of NYS clinicians use of AI to better understand opportunities for its adoption and inclusion in continuing education. For this analysis, we included healthcare providers who deliver ambulatory or specialty medical care within NYS, with use/frequency/purpose of AI tools by clinicians in their work as the main outcome. Of 305 NYS clinical providers responding, 23.4% indicated they use AI tools for work, and 11.1% report monthly use, 8.5% weekly use, and 4.6% daily use. AI was primarily used to search guidelines and ask clinical questions, followed by identifying drug interactions, analyzing data, analyzing images/labs, and creating care plans and patient recommendations. AI use did not vary significantly across professional disciplines or practice types, though independent practitioners were significantly more likely than advanced practice providers to use AI in their work, as were providers using social media and digital methods for obtaining continuing education. AI use increased substantially in 2025 compared with 2024. Overall, our findings suggest that programs targeting clinicians could incorporate these findings in designing accessible and acceptable AI-related continuing education opportunities to help familiarize clinicians with opportunities and risks for integrating AI tools into their practices. Author SummaryAI tools are rapidly gaining traction in the delivery of healthcare. We found that clinician use of AI was quite limited (23%), though growing. Those using AI tools used them sparingly in their work, with only about 5% reporting daily use. The purposes for which clinicians report using AI - asking clinical questions, interpreting patient results, creating patient educational materials - could contribute substantially to healthcare outcomes if widely adopted. Designers of continuing education for clinicians should help provide opportunities for clinicians to improve their familiarity, use, and competency with AI tools, to help maximize the potential health benefits possible for patients and communities.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.0%
2
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
13.9%
4
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.1%
6
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
11
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.5%
12
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
13
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
14
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
16
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
19
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
22
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%