Back

11 million days of longitudinal wearable data reveal novel future health insights

Fulda, E. S.; Waxse, B. J.; Goleva, S. B.; Tran, T. C.; Taylor, H. J.; Bailey, C. P.; Wolff-Hughes, D. L.; Mo, H.; Zeng, C.; Keaton, J. M.; Ferrara, T. M.; Topiwala, A.; Doherty, A.; Denny, J. C.

2026-01-30 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.01.29.26344899 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundInsufficient physical activity (PA) is associated with higher risk of morbidity and premature mortality. Wearable devices offer a scalable, objective measurement of physical activity, but most studies reduce these data to a single activity metric measured over a fixed 7-day period. We compared different wearable-derived phenotyping approaches to understand their impact on activity-disease associations. MethodsWe analyzed 11 million days of Fitbit data from 29,351 participants in the All of Us Research Program, deriving four daily activity metrics (step count, peak 1-min cadence, peak 30-min cadence, and heart rate per step) across five time-windows (1-day, 1-week, 1-month, 6-months, 1-year). We performed phenome-wide analyses on >700 incident and >1,300 prevalent disease outcomes identified from linked electronic health records. FindingsAmong participants with EHR and Fitbit data (mean age 57.3 years, 69% female, 47% with >1 year of Fitbit data), all 20 phenotypes were highly correlated (median Pearson r = 0.71). Longer measurement windows yielded stronger and more stable associations, with 1-year step count associated with 373 prevalent and 37 incident outcomes (versus 231 and 17 for 1-day step count) after Bonferroni-correction, including novel associations with chronic pain syndrome, SARS-CoV-2, and autoimmune disease. Differences between prevalent and incident associations suggest that activity metrics can act as both early markers of disease or risk factors. InterpretationThese findings highlight how large-scale, longitudinal wearable data can advance understanding of health and disease and inform scalable approaches for clinical risk stratification. FundingNational Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program, Wellcome Trust RESEARCH IN CONTEXTO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSLow levels of physical activity relate to numerous health outcomes. However, prior studies are limited by a focus on disease prevalence and by a lack of examination across a broad range of health outcomes. Further, the strength of these associations, depends on how physical activity is measured. Prior work shows that wearable devices capture activity more reliably than self-report surveys and typically yield stronger associations with disease risk. Most wearable-based studies rely on short monitoring windows: often seven days or fewer. To our knowledge, no study has systematically evaluated how the duration of wearable-based phenotyping influences estimates of disease risk. To explore this, we searched PubMed using the terms "wearable phenotyping" AND "disease risk", resulting in 48 articles published between 2016 and 2025. Although some studies compared different wearable-derived phenotypes (e.g., step count vs. sleep duration) or explored how the number of observed days affects data quality, none directly evaluated how the length of the phenotyping period shapes associations with disease risk. Added value of this studyUsing nearly 11 million person-days of Fitbit data from [~]30,000 participants, this study evaluates how four wearable-derived activity metrics, summarized across five time windows, influence estimates of activity-disease associations. We identified over 300 previously unreported associations for any of our four metrics and various health outcomes. Longer phenotyping windows consistently yielded stronger associations than shorter ones, although all windows remained informative. These findings highlight the importance of extended wearable monitoring for robust risk characterization. We further compared incident cases with both prevalent and incident outcomes, illustrating the roles of physical activity as a potentially modifiable risk factor, and an early marker of disease. Implications of all the available evidenceThese findings have two important implications. First, longer periods of wearable data collection improve the accuracy of disease risk estimation and should be considered in the design of epidemiologic studies and in the development of clinical guidelines. Although associations between physical activity and disease were directionally consistent across all time windows, effect sizes varied substantially, an observation with important consequences for public health recommendations. Second, this study represents one of the first large-scale demonstrations of long-term wearable monitoring for real-world risk stratification, marking an important advance toward individualized health assessment and intervention.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.4%
2
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.9%
8
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
9
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
15
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
19
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
24
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 49%
0.5%