Back

Sex-specific Flexibility in Breeding and Helping Strategies in the Sociable Weaver (Philetairus socius)

Garcia-Campa, J.; Silva, L. R.; Ferreira, A.; Silva, N. J.; Theron, F.; Doutrelant, C.; Covas, R.

2026-01-30 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.01.28.702364 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Helping-at-the-nest is often viewed as a precursor to reproduction, but switching between breeder and helper roles has been documented in some species. Such flexibility should depend on the opportunities and benefits of helping, which could differ between sexes due to dispersal strategies and social structure. However, whether breeding-helping flexibility is widespread and sex-specific remains unknown. Here, we investigated sex-specific strategies in breeding-helping flexibility using a 10-year dataset (1955 individuals) on sociable weavers (Philetairus socius), a colonial cooperative breeder in which males are typically philopatric whereas females disperse. Both sexes helped for several years, with males helping more frequently than females and for twice as long (0-13 vs 0-10 years). Around 40% of non-dispersing birds never became breeders and 50% of individuals bred without helping first. Both sexes switched roles between- and within-seasons but males were more likely to alternate (respectively four and six times more than females and up 15 switches across seven years). Our study reveals important flexibility and sex differences in breeder-helper roles, consistent with sex-biased dispersal, spatial breeding proximity and possible indirect fitness benefits. These factors could play a role promoting the evolution of helping across life-stages, not only pre-reproduction, but also reproductive and post-reproductive individuals.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
16.7%
2
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
3
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.0%
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.6%
6
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
8
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
10
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
11
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
12
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
15
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
16
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
17
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
20
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.4%
23
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
24
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
29
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
30
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%