Back

Serum neurofilament light chain predicts stroke outcome and is a potential marker for treatment effects of neural stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in a rat stroke model

Cannon, M. K.; Fojtik, A. R.; White, C. M.; Swetenburg, R. L.; Stice, S. L.; Savitz, S. I.; Baker, E. W.

2026-01-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.28.702334 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a leading cause of disability worldwide, and effective treatments are urgently needed beyond reperfusion therapy. Translating preclinical success to clinical impact has been hindered by variability in animal models and the lack of translational biomarkers that predict outcomes across species. To overcome these barriers, we developed a robust rat AIS model optimized for consistency and severity, enabling rigorous therapeutic testing. Additionally, we tested a panel of common clinical serum biomarkers to improve translation from rodents to humans. We demonstrated that serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) -a biomarker widely used in clinical stroke studies-strongly correlated with functional outcomes, establishing a translational link that has not been previously reported in rats. Notably, NfLs predictive capabilities outperformed infarct volume, a key prognostic factor in moderate and severe strokes, as well as traditional serum biomarkers intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and S100 calcium binding protein (S100B). Using this platform, we evaluated the therapeutic impact of neural stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (NSC EVs), a novel biologic therapy poised for clinical trials, on stroke outcome in our rat AIS model. A three-dose regimen of NSC EV over 48 hours produced the best outcomes in stroked animals evidenced by smaller infarct volume, improved neurologic score, and reduced serum NfL, although single-dose and two-dose regimens were both effective at some endpoints. These findings not only validate NfL as a cross-species biomarker but also provide critical dosing insights for NSC EV therapy, accelerating the path from bench to bedside for AIS treatment.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
3
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.5%
4
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.0%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.5%
6
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
8
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.8%
9
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
12
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
16
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
18
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
19
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
20
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Journal of Neuroinflammation
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
29
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%