Back

Quantifying Uncertainty in the Re-Emergence of Yellow Fever Virus

Kornetzke, N.; Wearing, H. J.

2026-01-30 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.28.702222 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Emerging infectious diseases are a persistent public health threat that challenge deterministic, mechanistic modeling approaches. Because outbreaks initially start with a low number of infected hosts, their dynamics are highly stochastic, making traditional deterministic methods, e.g. ordinary differential equations, unable to qualitatively or quantitatively capture the transmission dynamics. In place, stochastic models are used, such as Markov chain models, but these models present their own challenges. Often, to infer a quantity of interest with stochastic models, we need to sample the models distribution many times over, introducing an additional source of noise to our analysis. This additional noise makes the inference of our quantity of interest more difficult and computationally expensive. Here, we show how novel tools from the field of uncertainty quantification can be used to efficiently separate these two channels of noise, allowing us to make rigorous statistical inferences about processes important for disease emergence. We illustrate these techniques with a model of yellow fever virus spillover in the Americas, a virus that has seen rapid re-emergence amongst multiple hosts and vectors in South America over the last decade. We show that only a handful of parameters uncertainties greatly affect variation in cumulative disease incidence. In particular, uncertainty in patch connectivity and non-human primate latency has the greatest impact on the variation of cumulative disease incidence of yellow fever virus across patches. Author ContributionsConceptualization: Nate Kornetzke, Helen J. Wearing. Methodology: Nate Kornetzke, Helen J. Wearing. Formal Analysis: Nate Kornetzke. Software: Nate Kornetzke. Visualization: Nate Kornetzke. Writing, Original Draft Preparation: Nate Kornetzke. Writing, Review and Editing: Helen J. Wearing. Supervision: Helen J. Wearing. Author SummaryEmerging infectious diseases are a growing threat to public health. Computational models allow researchers to forecast future disease burdens and to investigate counterfactual scenarios, and often, these models are stochastic, i.e. contain randomness, to capture the qualitative behavior of emergence. A type of statistical analysis known as global sensitivity analysis allows modelers to rigorously analyze how varying the input to a model affects variation in its outputs. This type of analysis helps us infer what mechanisms are important for disease mitigation and control, especially when an infectious disease has a complex ecology consisting of multiple hosts and vectors. Until recently, stochastic models of emerging infectious diseases often proved too computationally expensive to perform a global sensitivity analysis on. Here, we demonstrate how new mathematical tools allow us to streamline this process for complex models of emerging infectious diseases. We analyze the ecology of re-emerging yellow fever in South America, a public health threat occurring in many hosts and vectors across vastly different ecosystems.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
32.4%
2
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
4
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
5
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
7
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
9
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
10
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
12
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
15
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
16
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
18
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
20
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
21
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
22
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
23
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
24
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
26
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Journal of the Royal Society Interface
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%