Back

AI-enhanced cardiac digital twins extend drug proarrhythmic risk assessment through experimental data uncertainty propagation and overdose exploration: a loperamide case study

Dominguez Gomez, P.; Zingaro, A.; Balzotti, C.; Leitner, M.; Jacobo-Piqueras, N.; Vazquez, M.; Rast, G.; Aguado-Sierra, J.

2026-01-30 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.28.702200 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Drug-induced QT interval prolongation is a key biomarker of proarrhythmic risk and central to drug cardiac safety evaluation alongside in vitro assays and animal studies. Current preclinical frameworks, however, provide limited insight into how experimental uncertainty and extreme exposures translate into real-world arrhythmic risk, despite both factors critically modulating outcomes. To address this, we used sex-specific machine learning surrogate models trained on 3D cardiac digital twins--mechanistic electrophysiology models of anatomically detailed ventricles that integrate multichannel ion-channel block data. These emulators combine the realism of 3D simulations with high-throughput capability, enabling rapid, ethically unconstrained assessment of proarrhythmic risk. We illustrate the approach using loperamide, safe at therapeutic doses but linked to fatal arrhythmias at extreme exposures. Two analyses were performed: propagating experimental IC50 and Hill coefficient variability to quantify its effect on predicted QT prolongation and arrhythmic probability, and simulating extreme exposures to identify sex-specific arrhythmogenic thresholds. Experimental variability substantially broadened predicted QT prolongation and arrhythmic risk near decision thresholds. Extreme exposure simulations identified arrhythmogenic thresholds of approximately 107-109 x Cmax in female models and 213-286 x Cmax in male models. This framework offers a scalable, physics-based tool for early-stage drug cardiac safety evaluation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
10.7%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.7%
3
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.4%
7
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
8
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.1%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
12
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
13
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
16
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
17
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.5%
19
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
22
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
27
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%