Back

A Chemical-Genetic Interaction Matrix Reveals Drug Mechanism and Genetic Architecture

Coulombe-Huntington, J.; Bertomeu, T.; Huard, C.; Chatr-aryamontri, A.; St-Cyr, D. J.; Sanchez-Osuna, M.; Papadopoli, D.; Normandin, K.; Paydar, M.; McLaughlan, S.; St-Denis, C.; Zhang, L.; Say, H.; Palou, R.; Stark, C.; Breitkreutz, B.-J.; van der Sloot, A. M.; Manohar, S.; Lavoie, H.; Borden, K. L. B.; Raught, B.; D'Amours, D.; Sicheri, F.; Verreault, A.; Mader, S.; Meloche, S.; Therrien, M.; Thibault, P.; Wilhelm, B.; Dirks, P. B.; Aitchison, J. D.; Patton, E. E.; King, R. W.; Roux, P. P.; Sauvageau, G.; Hoang, T.; Marinier, A.; Harrington, L.; Kwok, B.; Archambault, V.; Topisirovic, I.; Ty

2026-01-29 systems biology
10.64898/2026.01.28.701823 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To probe drug mechanism of action (MOA) and interrogate the genetic architecture of human cells, we carried out isogenic genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens against 310 diverse drugs, bioactive compounds, and stress conditions. Stringent statistical correction for gene knockout fitness defects yielded a large-scale matrix of >12,000 high confidence chemical-genetic interactions (CGIs). This dataset revealed many previously unappreciated off-target effects for well-characterized compounds and novel MOAs for uncharacterized compounds. The CGI matrix uncovered dense genetic modules that yielded new biological insights into phospholipidosis, mitotic regulation, metabolism, the DNA damage response, and mTOR signaling. The dataset allowed identification of multi-drug sensitization and resistance mechanisms, inference of gene function, elaboration of cross-process connectivity, evaluation of the cell type specificity of CGIs, prediction of chemical synergism, and extensive annotation of understudied genes. This resource provides a map of the genetic landscape in human cells and a framework to help guide drug discovery.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.