Back

Targeted saliva multi-omics is a reliable, non-invasive method to capture physiological stress and recovery

Wenzel, C.; Kalaycik, B.; Billig, A.; Trebing, S.; Joisten, N.; Kolodziej, M.; Braun, M.; Lippelt, L.; Gerharz, A.; Millard, M.; Wieder, O.; Kipper, K.; Iebed, A.; Groll, A.; Walzik, D.; Zimmer, P.

2026-01-30 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.01.28.26345066 medRxiv
Show abstract

Determining physiological stress at high resolution is crucial across diverse settings to enable informed decision-making in the context of health and disease. Saliva-based targeted multi-omics testing provides a powerful, non-invasive method to quantify physiological stress and circadian dynamics at high-frequency. In a laboratory crossover trial with 24-hour sampling comprising 413 saliva samples, we demonstrate high analytical reliability, distinct molecular individuality, and robust acute and delayed responses to physical exercise across proteins, metabolites, and lipids. Moreover, we present the most comprehensive existing dataset describing 24-hour molecular kinetics across these three omics layers. Leveraging this controlled setting, we applied machine learning to single-timepoint saliva samples to accurately predict recent physical exercise both immediately after and 24 hours later. Next, we translated this analytical framework to a real-world longitudinal setting of elite football players monitored over 16 months, comprising over 12,000 saliva samples. Despite increased biological and contextual variability, the model retained robust discrimination between exercise and rest on the following day. Based on prediction probabilities, we introduce a saliva-based internal strain metric, that captures internal load and can be harnessed to monitor physical exercise and recovery. Model robustness was further supported through out-of-sample validation using previously unseen observations. Our findings demonstrate that saliva-based targeted multi-omics reliably captures physical exercise and recovery states in both laboratory and real-world environments, providing a scalable framework for monitoring physical performance. This non-invasive approach holds broad potential for physiological monitoring and can serve as a blueprint for health- and disease-related contexts.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.6%
2
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.2%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
5
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.9%
9
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
10
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
12
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
14
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
15
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
16
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
20
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
24
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
25
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
29
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%