Back

An Integrated Multi-omic Analysis Reveals Novel Gene-Metabolite Relationships in Human Steatohepatitic Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Anspach, G. B.; Flight, R. M.; Park, S.; Moseley, H. N. B.; Helsley, R. N.

2026-01-30 oncology
10.64898/2026.01.28.26344977
Show abstract

BackgroundMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the fastest-growing etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A mechanistic understanding of the metabolic heterogeneity of MASLD-driven tumors is crucial to inform strategies for future treatment options. MethodsPaired tumor (n=8) and adjacent non-tumor tissue (n=8) were collected from patients with steatohepatitic HCC at the University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was used for pathological determination of tumor and adjacent nontumor tissue by a board-certified pathologist. Lipidomic, metabolomic, and transcriptomic analyses were performed, and data were integrated across platforms to identify novel relationships across tumor and adjacent nontumor tissue. ResultsHistological analysis by H&E showed significant lipid vacuole accumulation and inflammatory foci in HCC tumors relative to nontumor tissue. Across omics platforms, we identified 1,679 genes, 1,696 metabolites, and 292 lipids that were significantly (padj<0.01) increased or decreased in tumors relative to nontumor tissue. We identified significant reductions in total ceramides and increases in fatty acyl chain saturation in tumor tissue. Furthermore, metabolites involved in amino acid and fatty acid metabolism were largely decreased in tumors relative to nontumor tissue. We also identified a total of 303 highly significant and novel transcript-metabolite associations (117 gene-metabolite; 186 gene-lipid) across tumor and nontumor tissue. ConclusionsTaken together, this integrative analysis reveals novel relationships between steady-state gene transcripts and specific metabolites in steatohepatitic tumors, thereby identifying new pharmacological targets that may be exploited for therapeutic benefit.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 1.0%
13.3%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 55%
8.0%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 0.7%
5.6%
4
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 16%
4.7%
5
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 3%
3.1%
6
Metabolites
based on 10 papers
Top 0.2%
3.1%
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 51%
3.0%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 3%
3.0%
9
Cell Reports
based on 25 papers
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Clinical and Translational Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 3%
1.9%
13
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
16
EMBO Molecular Medicine
based on 15 papers
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
19
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
20
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 20%
1.4%
21
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
23
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
24
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
25
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
26
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
27
JCI Insight
based on 63 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
28
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Cell
based on 28 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 4%
0.8%