Back

An Integrated Multi-omic Analysis Reveals Novel Gene-Metabolite Relationships in Human Steatohepatitic Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Anspach, G. B.; Flight, R. M.; Park, S.; Moseley, H. N. B.; Helsley, R. N.

2026-01-30 oncology
10.64898/2026.01.28.26344977 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the fastest-growing etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A mechanistic understanding of the metabolic heterogeneity of MASLD-driven tumors is crucial to inform strategies for future treatment options. MethodsPaired tumor (n=8) and adjacent non-tumor tissue (n=8) were collected from patients with steatohepatitic HCC at the University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was used for pathological determination of tumor and adjacent nontumor tissue by a board-certified pathologist. Lipidomic, metabolomic, and transcriptomic analyses were performed, and data were integrated across platforms to identify novel relationships across tumor and adjacent nontumor tissue. ResultsHistological analysis by H&E showed significant lipid vacuole accumulation and inflammatory foci in HCC tumors relative to nontumor tissue. Across omics platforms, we identified 1,679 genes, 1,696 metabolites, and 292 lipids that were significantly (padj<0.01) increased or decreased in tumors relative to nontumor tissue. We identified significant reductions in total ceramides and increases in fatty acyl chain saturation in tumor tissue. Furthermore, metabolites involved in amino acid and fatty acid metabolism were largely decreased in tumors relative to nontumor tissue. We also identified a total of 303 highly significant and novel transcript-metabolite associations (117 gene-metabolite; 186 gene-lipid) across tumor and nontumor tissue. ConclusionsTaken together, this integrative analysis reveals novel relationships between steady-state gene transcripts and specific metabolites in steatohepatitic tumors, thereby identifying new pharmacological targets that may be exploited for therapeutic benefit.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
52.2%
50% of probability mass above
2
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
3
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
5
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
6
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
7
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
9
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
12
Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.3%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
16
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.6%
26
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%