Back

Community action for newborn care and survival through participatory women's groups and health workers in rural Bangladesh: a before-and-after implementation study of scale-up.

Fottrell, E.; Akter, K.; Kuddus, A.; Kumar Shaha, S.; Nahar, B.; Azam, G.; Nahar, T.; Costello, A.; Azad, K.

2026-01-30 public and global health
10.64898/2026.01.28.26344942 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCommunity mobilisation through participatory womens groups (PWGs) has been shown to be an effective intervention to improve maternal and neonatal survival in low-income settings, including Bangladesh. Despite WHO recommendations and scale-up in some contexts, the intervention has not been widely scaled-up in Bangladesh. To add to the existing evidence-base for PWGs and to renew calls for effective, scalable interventions to improve neonatal outcomes in the post-Sustainable Development Goals era, we report the design, implementation and evaluation of a volunteer-led model for PWGs delivered in rural Bangladesh in 2014/15. MethodsWorking in three rural unions in Faridpur, Bangladesh, we applied a volunteer-led, lower coverage and shorter duration PWG intervention. Mixed methods evaluation monitored key indicators of intervention delivery, uptake and receipt. Prospective quantitative surveys gathered data on birth outcomes, health care utilisation and essential newborn care practices. Data from before and after the implementation period were compared and interpreted in relation to historical trends in the study area and other rural areas of Bangladesh. Results180 participatory womens groups facilitated by 45 volunteer facilitators over a period of 15 months were successfully implemented giving a population coverage of one group per 500 population. An average of 32 (min.=18, max.=64) participants attended each PWG meeting, 42% of participants attended meetings on a monthly basis and 11% reported that they actively shared information from the PWGs with non-attenders. 30% of women of reproductive age and 54% of pregnant women participated in the. Focus group discussions with participants and community members revealed positive attitudes towards the groups. A change in trend in extended perinatal mortality rates was observed during the intervention period, corresponding temporally with indicators of improved rates of service utilisation and essential newborn care practices relative to the pre-implementation period. ConclusionThe modified PWG intervention likely contributed to positive changes in delivery and neonatal care practices similar to previous studies in Bangladesh. The PWG model remains an important approach to community empowerment that could contribute to enhanced efforts to end preventable neonatal deaths as we move towards the end of the Sustainable Development Goal era and beyond.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
28.6%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.5%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.4%
4
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
6
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
7
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
11
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
14
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
15
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
19
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
27
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
28
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
29
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%